Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Goal oriented interventions reduce condomless sex likelihood among people living with HIV in network meta-analysisSexual Health Interventions Reduce Condomless Sex Among People With HIV

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that goal oriented interventions are specifically effective at reducing condomless sex among people living with HIV.

This network meta-analysis synthesized evidence from randomized controlled trials involving 12,967 people living with HIV aged 18 years and older. The analysis evaluated the impact of sexual health interventions, including goal oriented interventions and safe sex skills training, compared to standard care regarding condomless sex and multiple sexual partners.

Goal oriented interventions were associated with a reduced likelihood of engaging in condomless sex (OR: 0.54; 95%CI: 0.39 to 0.76). Safe sex skills training also showed a reduction in the likelihood of condomless sex (OR: 0.65; 95%CI: 0.43 to 0.99). No significant effects were observed regarding the number of multiple sexual partners.

A primary limitation noted is that only goal oriented interventions demonstrated statistically significant superiority over control conditions across most subgroup analyses, including country income level, intervention format, delivery mode, recruitment setting, and participant type. These findings suggest that while both types of training may influence behavior, goal oriented approaches show more consistent results across diverse settings.

Researchers looked at how different types of sexual health programs affect behaviors in adults living with HIV. The study analyzed data from nearly 13,000 people to compare special training programs against standard care. They specifically looked at whether these programs could reduce the likelihood of engaging in condomless sex or having multiple sexual partners.

The results showed that both goal-oriented interventions and safe sex skills training were linked to a lower likelihood of condomless sex compared to standard care. However, only the goal-oriented programs showed consistent success across different settings and types of participants. The study did not find any significant changes in the number of sexual partners for those in the programs.

While these results are promising, it is important to note that this was a large review of existing data rather than a new clinical trial. Because only goal-oriented interventions showed consistent success across all groups, they may be more reliable for various populations. You should talk with a healthcare provider to discuss which specific programs might be best for your personal health goals.

What this means for you:
Goal-oriented sexual health programs can reduce the likelihood of condomless sex among people living with HIV.

Common questions

What kind of sexual health programs were most effective?

The study found that goal-oriented interventions were particularly effective. These specific types of programs showed a consistent reduction in the likelihood of condomless sex across various settings, delivery modes, and participant types compared to standard care.

Did these programs change the number of sexual partners?

The study did not find any significant effects on the number of sexual partners for people living with HIV who participated in the sexual health interventions. The focus was primarily on behaviors like condomless sex.

How much did these programs reduce the risk of condomless sex?

Goal-oriented interventions showed a significant reduction, with an odds ratio of 0.54 compared to standard care. Safe sex skills training also showed a reduced likelihood of condomless sex, with an odds ratio of 0.65.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionNumerous sexual health interventions have been employed to promote safer sexual practices among people living with HIV (PLWH). However, their effectiveness remains uncertain.ObjectivesThis review aimed to assess and rank the effectiveness of different sexual health interventions targeting risky sexual behaviors in PLWH.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Elsevier, the Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2010 and June 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included if they recruited PLWH aged ≥18 years and reported original quantitative data on condomless sex and multiple sexual partners across different groups. The network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted within a Bayesian framework. We used a random effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2.0 tool, and the strength of the body of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.ResultsA total of 34 eligible trials involving 12,967 PLWH and covering four types of sexual health interventions were included. In total, six trials reported outcomes on multiple sexual partners, but no significant effects were observed. A total of 33 trials reporting condomless sex were included in the network meta-analysis. Goal-oriented interventions ranked highest, with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 0.903 and 0.828. Compared to standard care, goal-oriented interventions (OR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.39 to 0.76) and safe sex skills training (OR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.43 to 0.99) significantly reduced the likelihood of engaging in condomless sex. However, only goal-oriented interventions showed statistically significant superiority over control conditions in most subgroup analyses, including those stratified by country income level, intervention format and delivery mode, recruitment setting, and participant type.ConclusionThis review highlights the effectiveness of goal-oriented interventions in substantially reducing condomless sexual behaviors among PLWH. Such interventions should be prioritized to address the persistently high prevalence of risky sexual behaviors in this population, with important implications for preventing potential HIV recombination and other sexually transmitted infection (STI) co-infections, thereby reducing the overall health burden in this vulnerable group.Systematic review registrationIdentifier CRD42023414692.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.