Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Traditional Chinese medicine injections combined with chemotherapy may improve outcomes and tolerability in advanced NSCLCTraditional Chinese Medicine Injections May Improve Lung Cancer Treatment

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that TCMIs combined with chemotherapy may improve clinical responses and tolerability in advanced NSCLC.

This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of various traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) when combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The analysis included 6,386 patients to compare multiple TCMIs, including Kanglaite, Kang’ai, Shenqi Fuzheng, Aidi, Fufang Kushen, Shenmai, Yadanzi Youru, Xiao’aiping, Renshen duotang, and Huangqi Duotang injections.

The authors synthesized evidence indicating that specific TCMIs may have favorable rankings across various outcomes. For example, Kanglaite Injection was associated with favorable ranking for objective response rate (ORR) and CD8 cells; Shenqi Fuzheng showed favorable results for NK cells and CA19-9; and Aidi, Fufang Kushen, and Huangqi Duotang were associated with favorable rankings regarding various adverse reactions like bone marrow suppression or gastrointestinal symptoms. Other injections showed favorable rankings for specific markers such as SCC, CD4+ T cell ratios, and tumor-associated markers.

The authors note that the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity, methodological limitations of included studies, and a general lack of certainty in the findings. While TCMIs may be associated with improved treatment tolerability and clinical responses, these results should be interpreted cautiously due to the quality of the source data.

How this fits prior evidence

This network meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding adjunctive therapies for advanced NSCLC. While prior evidence notes that PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors increase skin rash risk, this study suggests certain TCMIs like Kanglaite Injection may have favorable rankings regarding skin adverse reactions. Additionally, while targeted therapy plus chemotherapy improves response rates in TNBC, these findings explore the role of TCMIs as a potential adjunct to standard chemotherapy for NSCLC patients.

Researchers analyzed data from 6,386 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to see how different traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) performed when combined with chemotherapy. The study looked at several specific types of injections, such as Kanglaite and Fufang Kushen, to see if they helped with tumor response or reduced side effects.

The findings suggest that certain combinations might be linked to better clinical responses and improved immune markers. For example, some injections were associated with better results regarding skin reactions or liver and kidney function. However, the researchers noted that these results are based on a network meta-analysis, which combines several different studies into one large analysis.

You should be cautious when viewing these results because the evidence is not very certain. The study included many different types of treatments and methods, making it hard to draw firm conclusions. Because of these limitations, these findings are currently used for research purposes rather than as a standard guide for clinical practice.

What this means for you:
Some traditional Chinese medicine injections may improve lung cancer treatment outcomes, but evidence is currently limited.

Common questions

What are the benefits of using these injections with chemotherapy?

The study found that some specific traditional Chinese medicine injections, when paired with chemotherapy, were associated with better clinical responses and improved immune markers. Some types also showed favorable rankings for reducing certain side effects, such as skin reactions or issues with liver and kidney function.

Are these treatments safe for lung cancer patients?

The study noted that combining these injections with chemotherapy might improve how well a patient tolerates treatment. However, the evidence is not very certain due to differences in the studies included. You should talk to your doctor about specific safety concerns and risks.

How certain are these findings for medical use?

The results should be interpreted with caution. The researchers noted limited certainty of evidence, significant differences between the studies studied, and some methodological limitations. These findings are currently used to inform research rather than changing standard practice.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although chemotherapy is an important treatment strategy for advanced NSCLC, its efficacy is limited by treatment resistance and adverse events. Traditional Chinese medicine injections (TCMIs) are widely used as adjunctive therapies; however, the comparative efficacy and safety of different TCMI-based regimens remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of various TCMIs combined with chemotherapy using Bayesian network meta-analysis. RCTs on TCMIs combined with chemotherapy for NSCLC were retrieved from Chinese databases including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, as well as English databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The retrieval period was from January 1, 2021 to May 1, 2026. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and the certainty of network evidence was evaluated using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. Stata and R software were used to perform network meta-analysis. A total of 71 RCTs involving 6,386 patients were included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that Kanglaite Injection combined with chemotherapy showed a relatively favorable ranking for objective response rate (ORR), CD8, and skin adverse reactions; Kang’ai Injection combined with chemotherapy for hemoglobin reduction-related adverse reactions; Shenqi Fuzheng Injection for natural killer cells (NK cells), immunoglobulin G (IgG), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9); Aidi Injection for immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin M (IgM), and bone marrow suppression-related adverse reactions; Fufang Kushen Injection for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and adverse reactions such as leukopenia, liver and kidney function damage, and gastrointestinal symptoms; Shenmai Injection combined with chemotherapy for carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125); Yadanzi Youru injection combined with chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC); Xiao’aiping Injection for cluster of differentiation 4 positive T lymphocyte (CD4+ T Cell)/cluster of differentiation 8 positive T lymphocyte (CD8+ T Cell); Renshen duotang injection for disease control rate (DCR), cluster of differentiation 3 positive T lymphocyte (CD3+ T Cell), cluster of differentiation 4 positive T lymphocyte (CD4+ T Cell), and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1); Huangqi Duotang injection combined with chemotherapy for thrombocytopenia-related adverse reactions. Meta-regression analyses identified statistical associations between age and effect estimates of CYFRA21-1, SCC, VEGF, and IgM; however, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory associations rather than causal explanations. Subgroup analysis of CYFRA21–1 suggested potential differences across age-related subgroups, which require further validation. TCMIs combined with chemotherapy maybe associated with improvements in clinical response, immune-related indicators, tumor-associated markers, and treatment tolerability in patients with advanced NSCLC. However,given the limited certainty of evidence, substantial heterogeneity, and methodological limitations of included studies, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and require confirmation through high-quality prospectivestudies. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420261392216.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.