Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Gamified mobile health intervention increases physical activity in college students over 8 weeks

Gamified mobile health intervention increases physical activity in college students over 8 weeks
Photo by Trnava University / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider gamified mobile health for short-term physical activity boosts in college students, but long-term data are lacking.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 160 college students (aged 18-25 years, BMI 18.5-30.0) at Yantai University over 8 weeks. The intervention group used a team-based gamified mobile health system with competition, points, leaderboards, feedback, and rewards via a fitness watch-app, targeting ≥150 minutes of MVPA per week or ≥900 MET-min per week. The control group used the same fitness watch-app system with identical physical activity targets but without gamification elements.

Main results showed the intervention group had higher physical activity: mean daily steps were 10,356 (SD 1245) vs 8,242 (SD 1087) in controls (Δ=2114 steps, d=1.81, 95% CI 1.44-2.18, P<.001), mean daily MVPA minutes were 71 (SD 15) vs 43 (SD 12) (Δ=28 minutes, d=2.06, 95% CI 1.68-2.45, P<.001), and mean weekly MET-min were 1,650 (SD 310) vs 1,340 (SD 285) (Δ=310 MET-min, d=1.04, 95% CI 0.71-1.37, P<.001). Adherence was higher in the intervention group (P<.001), though absolute numbers were not reported. Secondary outcomes favored the intervention, including increases in skeletal muscle mass (Δ +0.54 kg, P<.001), decreases in body fat percentage (Δ -0.46 percentage points, P<.001), improved 800/1000 m run time (Δ -6.5 seconds, P<.001), and reduced depressive symptoms (Δ -2.0 points, P<.001).

Safety data indicated no serious adverse events occurred, but adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. Key limitations include the 8-week follow-up, which does not assess long-term effects, and lack of reported effect sizes for all secondary outcomes and adherence rates in absolute numbers. The study used intention-to-treat analysis with multiple imputation and had blinded outcome assessors/analysts, but the open-label design may introduce bias. Practice relevance is that this offers a low-cost, scalable strategy for university health-promotion programs using existing smartphone and wearable technology, with the randomized design allowing a clearer estimate of gamification's incremental contribution.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 80
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up300.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: College students commonly experience suboptimal health conditions, including insufficient physical activity (PA), excessive body weight, and declining physical fitness. Traditional interventions face low adherence, while gamified mobile health (mHealth) programs may improve engagement and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel gamified, incentive-based mHealth intervention on primary outcomes (PA and adherence) and secondary outcomes (physical fitness, body composition, executive function [EF], and mental health). METHODS: A 2-arm parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 2025 at Yantai University with 160 college students (18-25 years; BMI 18.5-30.0) who were randomized 1:1 (computer-generated, sex-stratified blocks of 4; concealed allocation) to the intervention group (IG) or control group (CG; n=80 each); major exclusions were contraindications to exercise, severe physical/mental illness, recent PA interventions, or psychotropic medication use. Both used the same fitness watch-app system and identical PA targets (≥150 min moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA] per week or ≥900 metabolic equivalent-minutes [MET-min] per week); IG additionally received team-based gamification (competition, points/leaderboards, feedback, and rewards), while CG received monitoring only. PA and adherence were monitored throughout the 8-week intervention; other outcomes were assessed at baseline and 8 weeks (fitness, body composition, EF, and mental health). Open-label with blinded outcome assessors/analysts; intention-to-treat (ITT) with multiple imputation. RESULTS: At 8 weeks, data were available for 154 participants (IG 78; CG 76); all 160 were analyzed per ITT. Compared to the CG, the IG demonstrated significantly higher mean levels in all primary PA outcomes over 8 weeks (daily steps: mean 10,356, SD 1245 versus 8242, SD 1087; Δ=2114; d=1.81, 95% CI 1.44-2.18; P<.001; daily MVPA: mean 71, SD 15 versus 43, SD 12 min; Δ=28 min; d=2.06, 95% CI 1.68-2.45; P<.001; and weekly MET-min: mean 1650, SD 310 versus 1340, SD 285; Δ=310; d=1.04, 95% CI 0.71-1.37; P<.001). Adherence was also higher in the IG (both P<.001). Key secondary outcomes, including skeletal muscle mass (Δ +0.54 kg), body fat percentage (Δ -0.46 percentage points), 800/1000 m run time (Δ -6.5 s), and depressive symptoms (Δ -2.0 points), significantly favored the IG (all P<.001). No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This RCT demonstrated that integrating gamification into an mHealth platform significantly enhanced PA, intervention adherence, and selected health outcomes among college students. The key innovation lies in the trial design, which held the technology platform and activity goals constant across groups, thereby allowing a clearer estimate of the incremental contribution of gamification. Unlike many existing studies, this approach reduces confounding from co-occurring intervention components in between-group comparisons. It therefore provides more comparable and methodologically robust evidence on the specific efficacy of gamification in mHealth interventions. For real-world implementation, this model leverages the existing smartphone and wearable ecosystem, offering a low-cost, scalable strategy for university health-promotion programs.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.