Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST show modest discrimination comparable to standard protocol for acute chest pain triage.

Marburg Heart Score and INTERCHEST show modest discrimination comparable to standard protocol for ac…
Photo by Europeana / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider MHS or INTERCHEST as alternatives with modest discrimination comparable to standard protocol for acute chest pain triage.

This prospective diagnostic accuracy study assessed the performance of the Marburg Heart Score (MHS) and INTERCHEST score during telephone triage for patients contacting an out-of-hours primary care facility in Alkmaar, the Netherlands, with acute chest pain. The study included 280 patients out of 1254 eligible individuals. The primary outcome measured discrimination (C-statistics) and diagnostic test properties for predicting major events or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within six weeks.

The comparator was the standard triage protocol from the Netherlands Triage Standard (NTS). Major events, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, urgent cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular conditions, occurred in 36 patients (12.9%). For predicting major events, the MHS C-statistic was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57 to 0.77), the INTERCHEST C-statistic was 0.64 (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.74), and the NTS C-statistic was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.53 to 0.71). Thirteen patients (4.6%) experienced ACS. For ACS prediction, the MHS C-statistic was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.45 to 0.79), the INTERCHEST C-statistic was 0.59 (95% CI: 0.43 to 0.75), and the NTS C-statistic was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.49 to 0.75).

Safety and tolerability were not reported. The study was conducted at a single center, which limits generalizability. Confidence intervals for C-statistics were wide, particularly for ACS outcomes. The modest discrimination values and overlapping confidence intervals suggest that no single tool demonstrated clear clinical superiority over the others in this setting.

Study Details

Sample sizen = 36
EvidenceLevel 5
Follow-up672.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the Marburg Heart Score (MHS) and INTERCHEST score may improve telephone triage of chest pain by providing better diagnostic discrimination compared with the triage protocol from the Netherlands Triage Standard (NTS). DESIGN: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Large regional out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) facility in Alkmaar, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1254 eligible patients contacted the OOH-PC facility (median age 56.0 years, 57.9% female) between December 2022 and May 2023. The study was completed and verbal informed consent obtained in 280 (22.3%) patients. INTERVENTIONS: Triage assistants asked study questions in addition to the NTS protocol to complete the MHS and INTERCHEST score. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Discrimination (C-statistics) and diagnostic test properties (eg, sensitivity/specificity) were used; the reference standard was the occurrence of a major event (ie, composite of all-cause mortality, and urgent cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within 6 weeks. RESULTS: A major event occurred in 36 patients (12.9%), including 13 (4.6%) ACS cases. For predicting major events, the MHS and INTERCHEST scores showed C-statistics of 0.67 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.77) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.74), respectively, compared with 0.62 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.71) for the NTS protocol. For ACS, C-statistics were 0.62 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.79), 0.59 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.75), and 0.62 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.75) for MHS, INTERCHEST and NTS, respectively. Regarding test characteristics, the MHS and INTERCHEST score showed higher point estimates for specificity (27.9% and 26.6%) vs the NTS (19.7%), but at the expense of lower sensitivity (88.9% and 86.1% versus 97.2%) for major events. For ACS, a similar pattern was observed (specificity 26.2% and 25.5% vs 18.4; sensitivity 84.6% and 84.6% vs 100.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Simple clinical decision rules (MHS and INTERCHEST) have comparable, modest discriminative ability and diagnostic properties compared with the current protocol for telephone triage of acute chest pain in Dutch OOH-PC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (TRACE - NL-OMON20102).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.