A historical controlled study evaluated a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to prevent nasal pressure injuries in patients undergoing prolonged oral, head and neck surgery. The study included 515 patients: 221 in a historical control group (pre-intervention) and 294 in the intervention group. The intervention consisted of structured risk assessment, dynamic and graded nursing interventions, systematic postoperative follow-up, and use of a modified CORN scale, compared to standard care in the historical control period.
The primary outcome was the incidence of nasal pressure injuries. The incidence decreased from 7.24% in the historical control group to 2.38% in the intervention group, representing a relative risk (RR) of 0.33 and an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 4.86% (p = 0.008; 95% CI for ARR: 1.19–9.23%; 95% CI for RR: 0.14–0.79). For secondary outcomes, stage 2 injuries were eliminated (3 cases in the control group vs. 0 in the intervention group), and no stage 3 or higher injuries were observed in either cohort.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the study's historical controlled design, which is subject to confounding and temporal bias, and the lack of reported follow-up duration. The absence of reported funding or conflicts of interest should be noted. The practice relevance is that the described bundle of interventions appears scalable for perioperative nursing management in this surgical context, but its effectiveness should be interpreted cautiously due to the study design.
View Original Abstract ↓
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative on reducing nasal pressure injuries related to nasotracheal tube (NTT) in patients undergoing prolonged oral, head and neck surgery.
Transnasal intubation is frequently employed in these procedures to optimize surgical field exposure. With the growing complexity and duration of surgeries, particularly for malignant tumors, the risk of nasal pressure injuries has increased. These injuries contribute to greater pain, extended hospital stays, higher treatment costs, and delayed recovery, underscoring the need for effective preventive measures. Under the Hospital Patient Safety Initiative, a multidisciplinary team was established to implement a comprehensive prevention strategy. This involved structured risk assessment, dynamic and graded nursing interventions, and systematic postoperative follow-up. A historical control study was conducted, comparing nasal pressure injury incidence over two 12-month periods: pre- and post-intervention.
A total of 515 patients were included—221 in the historical control (HC) group and 294 in the intervention group (IG). Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups, with all standardized mean differences (SMD) below 0.1. The incidence of nasal pressure injuries (PI) significantly decreased from 7.24% in the HC group to 2.38% in the IG group (p = 0.008, two-sided). The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 4.86% (95% CI: 1.19–9.23%), corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.14–0.79) and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 21 (95% CI: 11–85). Notably, stage 2 injuries were eliminated in the intervention group (3 vs. 0 cases), and no injuries of stage 3 or higher were observed in either cohort.
The multidisciplinary bundle, featuring a modified CORN scale and graded interventions, effectively reduces the risk of device-related nasal pressure injuries. This approach is scalable for perioperative nursing management in prolonged head and neck surgeries.