Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

OPTIMUM telehealth mindfulness program improves PEG scores in chronic low back pain patientsTelehealth Mindfulness Program Shows Improvement for Chronic Back Pain

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while the OPTIMUM mindfulness program showed statistically significant improvements, it did not meet the MCID.

This randomized clinical trial enrolled 451 adults with chronic low back pain attending primary care clinics. Participants were assigned to either the OPTIMUM intervention, an 8-week telehealth-delivered mindfulness group medical visit program, or usual care. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to month 6 in the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) scale score.

At 6 months, the intervention group showed a mean reduction of 1.21 compared to 0.59 in the control group (Difference: -0.62; 95% CI [-1.02, -0.23]; P = 0.002). Secondary outcomes at 8 weeks showed a difference of -0.89 (P < 0.001), and at 12 months, the difference was -0.74 (P < 0.001).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. A key limitation is that the mean difference in PEG scores did not reach the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1 point at any time point. The program may be a scalable nonpharmacologic option for chronic low back pain in primary care settings, though clinical significance remains unconfirmed.

Researchers conducted a randomized clinical trial involving 451 adults with chronic low back pain who visited primary care clinics. Participants were split into two groups. One group received an 8-week telehealth mindfulness program called OPTIMUM, while the other group received usual care. The study measured changes in a scale that tracks pain, enjoyment of life, and general activity.

The results showed that those in the mindfulness program saw greater improvements in their scores compared to the group receiving usual care at 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. These improvements were statistically significant at every check-in point.

However, it is important to note that while the results were statistically significant, the improvement did not reach the pre-set threshold for a clinically important difference. This means that while the change was measurable, it may not have been large enough for everyone to feel a major difference in daily life. This program is considered a scalable, non-drug option for managing back pain in primary care settings.

What this means for you:
A telehealth mindfulness program showed statistically significant improvements in back pain scores, though changes were modest.

Common questions

Is the mindfulness program safe for people with back pain?

The study did not report any specific adverse events, serious side effects, or reasons for patients to stop the program. Because it is a non-pharmacologic treatment, it is often used as a complementary approach. You should talk to your doctor to see if this specific program is right for your health needs.

How much did the program improve symptoms?

Participants in the mindfulness program showed better scores than those in the usual care group at 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months. However, the study noted that the improvement did not meet the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 1 point on the scale.

Who was included in this study?

The study included 451 adults who were experiencing chronic low back pain. These participants were seen in primary care clinics across Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina. The study was designed to see if a telehealth-delivered program could be a scalable option for these patients.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 451
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up1.8 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IMPORTANCE: Back pain is among the most common, disabling, and costly conditions managed in primary care in the US, but current treatment options often do not provide adequate relief. Mindfulness-based interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP); however, mindfulness remains underused in part because it is not integrated into most outpatient care models. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether persons with CLBP participating in a mindfulness group medical visit intervention experience significantly improved pain intensity and interference compared with those receiving usual care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial, Optimizing Pain Treatment in Medical Settings Using Mindfulness (OPTIMUM), using a pragmatic approach (designed to evaluate interventions under typical conditions of care) was conducted from May 7, 2021, to November 6, 2024. Adults with CLBP attending primary care clinics in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina were included. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized 1:1 to the OPTIMUM intervention, an 8-week telehealth-delivered mindfulness group medical visit program delivered as part of primary care (intervention), or usual care (controls). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary analysis assessed the between-group difference in the primary outcome of change from baseline to month 6 in the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) scale score. A mean minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in PEG score of at least 1 was considered. Secondary analyses evaluated the between-group differences in change from baseline to week 8 and month 12 in PEG score. RESULTS: Of 451 participants (mean [SD], 52.1 [14.7] years; 318 [70.5%] female), 224 were randomized to the intervention group and 227 to the control group. All reported moderate pain interference at baseline. In intention-to-treat analyses, the intervention participants had a statistically significant improvement in PEG score from baseline compared with controls at the 6-month primary time point (mean change, -1.21 [95% CI, -1.50 to -0.92] vs -0.59 [95% CI, -0.86 to -0.31]; between-group difference, -0.62 [95% CI, -1.02 to -0.23]; P = .002) and at 8 weeks (mean change, -1.16 [95% CI, -1.44 to -0.88] vs -0.27 [95% CI, -0.53 to -0.003]; between-group difference, -0.89 [95% CI, -1.27 to -0.51]; P < .001) and 12 months (mean change, -1.52 [95% CI, -1.81 to -1.23] vs -0.78 [95% CI, -1.05 to -0.50]; between-group difference, -0.74 [95% CI, -1.14 to -0.34]; P < .001). The MCID was not met at any time point. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, a telehealth-delivered mindfulness group medical visit program for persons with CLBP resulted in significant improvements in pain intensity and interference compared with usual care; however, these changes did not meet the prespecified mean 1-point MCID between groups. The program incorporated primary care clinicians, was accessible, and is potentially scalable as a nonpharmacologic treatment for CLBP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04129450.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.