Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review finds maternal health literacy associated with infant outcomes up to age threeMaternal health literacy linked to infant outcomes in early life

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider maternal health literacy as a potential factor in infant outcomes, but recognize low certainty evidence.

This systematic review synthesized evidence from studies involving 13,407 participants across seven countries, examining associations between maternal health literacy and infant/child health outcomes from birth through age three. The review focused on observational studies exploring how maternal health literacy relates to various health domains during early childhood.

The authors found consistent associations between higher maternal health literacy and favorable birth weight outcomes, as well as reduced neonatal jaundice readmission. Outcomes requiring maternal behavioral competencies, such as diaper dermatitis prevention, showed particularly strong and consistent associations with maternal health literacy. In vulnerable populations, inadequate maternal health literacy was associated with over four-fold increased risks for nutritional deficiencies and developmental delays.

The review acknowledges significant limitations including reliance on cross-sectional study designs and imprecision in measurements. The authors used GRADE methodology to rate the certainty of evidence as Low to Very Low, which underscores the need for standardized measurement approaches, longitudinal studies, and intervention trials to establish causality.

From a practice perspective, the authors suggest maternal health literacy shows promising systematic associations with infant outcomes across multiple domains spanning the early life course, operating primarily through behavioral pathways requiring maternal agency. This pattern supports conceptualizing maternal health literacy as a potential foundational public health determinant and equity-relevant intervention target, though the low certainty evidence requires cautious interpretation.

This systematic review examined the connection between a mother's ability to understand health information and the health of her infant or young child. The study included data from 13,407 participants in seven different countries, looking at outcomes from birth through age three. Researchers compared children of mothers with higher health literacy against those with inadequate literacy.

The analysis showed that higher maternal health literacy was consistently linked to favorable birth weights and reduced readmissions for neonatal jaundice. In areas requiring specific maternal behaviors, such as managing diaper dermatitis, stronger associations were found between literacy and positive outcomes. However, inadequate literacy was associated with an over four-fold increased risk of nutritional deficiencies and developmental delays in vulnerable populations.

No safety concerns were reported regarding the study itself, as it analyzed existing data rather than testing a new medical treatment. The main reason to be careful is that the study relied on cross-sectional designs, which limit the ability to prove cause and effect. Readers should take from this that improving health literacy is a promising public health goal, but more rigorous trials are needed to confirm these links and establish causality.

What this means for you:
Higher maternal health literacy linked to better infant outcomes, but evidence certainty is low.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundMaternal health literacy (MHL) represents a potentially modifiable public health determinant concentrated among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. While 15–45% of pregnant women demonstrate inadequate health literacy, its impact across the full spectrum of infant and early childhood outcomes remains inadequately characterized, limiting understanding of its broader public health significance.ObjectiveTo systematically synthesize evidence on associations between MHL and infant/child health outcomes from birth through age three, and to examine whether MHL functions as a systemic determinant across outcome domains.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science from inception through March 2025. Studies examining associations between validated MHL measures and any child health outcomes up to age three were included. Methodological quality was assessed using JBI checklists, and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE framework. Narrative synthesis was conducted.ResultsEight studies (n = 13,407 participants) from seven countries met inclusion criteria. Higher MHL was consistently associated with favorable birth weight. A pattern consistent with a behavioral pathway hypothesis emerged: outcomes requiring maternal behavioral competencies (e.g., symptom recognition, care-seeking) showed stronger and more consistent associations (e.g., reduced neonatal jaundice readmission, diaper dermatitis) than medically-determined conditions. Limited evidence also suggested MHL effects beyond the perinatal period, with inadequate MHL associated with increased risks of nutritional deficiencies and developmental delays (over four-fold increased risk in vulnerable populations). JBI assessment indicated generally adequate quality, while GRADE rated the certainty of evidence as Low to Very Low due to cross-sectional designs and imprecision.ConclusionMHL shows promising systematic associations with infant outcomes across multiple domains spanning the early life course, operating primarily through behavioral pathways requiring maternal agency. This pattern supports conceptualizing MHL as a potential foundational public health determinant and equity-relevant intervention target. However, low certainty of evidence underscores the need for standardized measurement, longitudinal studies, and intervention trials to establish causality.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.