This is a guideline based on a mixed-methods design comprising a Training Needs Assessment (TNA) and a Delphi survey. The scope was to identify and validate context-specific competencies for epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, including fragile and conflict-affected settings. The TNA involved 95 professionals from 18 MENA countries, and the Delphi survey involved 10 regional experts.
The authors synthesized that significant training gaps were observed across all five European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) preparedness domains. The highest training needs were identified in Policy Development, Adaptation, and Implementation, Detection and Assessment, and Health Services. A total of 99 competencies were classified, with 71 as essential, 23 as core, and 5 as basic.
Key limitations noted by the authors include resource shortages, weak governance, and limited access to training opportunities. The authors acknowledge that the findings are specific to the MENA context and may not be generalizable.
The practice relevance is that the findings directly informed the focus and content of a certificate in epidemic and pandemic preparedness. The evidence is observational and does not establish causality.
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionEpidemics and pandemics continue to expose persistent preparedness gaps across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), particularly in fragile and conflict-affected settings. Strengthening workforce capacities through context-specific competencies is critical for improving preparedness and enhancing health system resilience.MethodsGuided by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) preparedness framework, the study employed a two-phase mixed-methods design comprising a Training Needs Assessment (TNA) and Delphi survey. The TNA was administered to 95 professionals from 18 MENA countries. Gaps between perceived importance and ability to perform were analyzed quantitatively alongside thematic analysis of open responses. To ensure expert validation of these competencies, the Delphi survey was conducted and included 10 regional experts involved in two iterative online rounds and a consensus meeting to refine and prioritize competencies.ResultsThe TNA identified significant training gaps across all five ECDC preparedness domains, with the highest needs observed in Policy Development, Adaptation, and Implementation, Detection and Assessment and Health Services. Qualitative findings revealed additional barriers, including resource shortages, weak governance, and limited access to training opportunities. The Delphi process refined these findings, allowing experts to prioritize competencies as basic, core, essential, or omitted. Of the 99 competencies, 71 were classified as essential, 23 as core, and 5 as basic. The results of the surveys directly informed the focus and content of the certificate in epidemic and pandemic preparedness.ConclusionThis study utilized the ECDC preparedness framework to assess and refine competencies for epidemic and pandemic preparedness in the MENA region. Through a TNA and Delphi approach, it produced validated, context-specific competencies that informed the design of a contextualized regional certificate. The findings underscored the critical need for targeted training programs that address both immediate and long-term challenges in health system resilience in the MENA region.