Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Scoping Review Synthesizes Patient-Centered Burdens and Economic Outcomes in Veterans, IDD, and Rural PopulationsReview finds gaps in tracking burdens for veterans, people with disabilities, and rural residents

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that intangible burdens are most frequently reported while economic costs are less commonly assessed in these populations.

This U.S.-based scoping review synthesized evidence from 126 studies regarding patient-centered burdens and economic outcomes due to medical reasons. The scope included veterans, people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and individuals living in rural areas and their caregivers.

Intangible burdens were the most frequently reported patient-centered burdens and economic outcomes, appearing in 84 studies, representing 67% of the total. In contrast, direct medical costs were least commonly assessed, found in 47 studies (37%), and direct non-medical costs appeared in 28 studies (22%). Among veteran studies focusing on intangible burdens, 17 studies, or 63% of veteran studies on intangible burdens, utilized composite measures of caregiver burden. Studies on people with intellectual and developmental disabilities examining indirect impacts often focused on unpaid caregiving time, reported in 33 studies (58%).

Research justifications provided were tailored to their study population in 96 studies (76%). However, veteran studies with research justifications showed about half included justifications, specifically 13 studies (48%). IDD studies with research justifications had 84% included justifications (48 studies), while rural population studies with research justifications had 70% included justifications (33 studies).

Limitations noted include that across all groups, few studies assessed the full spectrum of patient-centered burdens and economic outcomes. Considerable variability in patient-centered burdens and economic outcomes examined across populations reveals gaps in comprehensive assessment of the full range of burdens each group experienced. These findings underscore the need for systematic data collection to more fully capture the range of burdens for these populations.

Researchers analyzed 126 studies involving veterans, people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and individuals in rural areas. The goal was to understand the patient-centered burdens and economic outcomes these groups face due to medical reasons. The review looked at direct costs like medical bills and travel, as well as indirect impacts such as unpaid caregiving time and intangible burdens like stress.

Across all groups, intangible burdens were the most frequently reported issue. However, direct medical costs and non-medical costs were assessed much less often. For example, studies on people with disabilities often looked at out-of-pocket expenses, while rural studies frequently examined travel costs. About three-quarters of the studies provided justifications for their research that were tailored to their specific population.

The review found considerable variability in what burdens were examined across different groups. Few studies looked at the full spectrum of burdens experienced by these populations. This gap means we do not yet have a complete picture of the challenges these groups face. Readers should take from this that more systematic data collection is needed to better understand and address these issues.

What this means for you:
Review shows gaps in tracking full range of burdens for veterans, people with disabilities, and rural residents.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundThis review synthesized literature on patient-centered burdens and economic outcomes (PCBEOs) for three populations that may be underrepresented in the literature—military veterans, people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), and individuals living in rural areas—to better understand how PCBEOs are captured for these populations.MethodsWe searched PubMed, CINAHL, EconLit, Web of Science, and APA PsycInfo (January 2015–April 2025) for U.S.-based studies of PCBEOs due to medical reasons for veterans, people with IDD, or people living in rural areas or their caregivers. We categorized PCBEOs into direct medical costs, direct non-medical costs, indirect impacts, and intangible burdens. We examined population-specific rationales for studying these outcomes reported in the studies.ResultsOf 1,549 identified records, 126 met inclusion criteria. Intangible burdens were the most frequently reported PCBEOs (n = 84, 67%), while direct medical (n = 47, 37%) and non-medical costs (n = 28, 22%) were least commonly assessed. Patterns in PCBEOs varied across populations: studies of veterans focused narrowly on intangible burdens (n = 23, 85% of veteran studies), specifically composite measures of caregiver burden (n = 17 studies, 63% of veteran studies on intangible burdens). Studies on people with IDD and rural populations more often examined multiple PCBEO categories, including indirect impacts (IDD n = 33, 58%; rural n = 22, 47%) such as unpaid caregiving time; direct medical costs (IDD n = 25, 44%; rural n = 19, 40%) such as out-of-pocket medical expenses, and direct non-medical costs (IDD n = 14, 25%; rural n = 14, 30%) such as travel costs. Across all groups, few studies assessed the full spectrum of PCBEOs. Most studies (n = 96, 76%) provided research justifications tailored to their study population, though this varied across groups—about half of veteran studies (n = 13, 48%) included justifications, compared with 84% (n = 48) for IDD and 70% (n = 33) for rural populations.ConclusionThe frequent reporting of intangible burdens across all populations highlights substantial emotional and psychological strains faced by these groups. Considerable variability in PCBEOs examined across populations reveals gaps in comprehensive assessment of the full range of PCBEOs that each group experienced. These findings underscore the need for systematic data collection to more fully capture the range of burdens for these populations.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.