Qualitative study explores UK social workers' perceptions of social prescribing
This qualitative study investigated the perspectives of 105 social workers across the UK regarding the implementation and utility of social prescribing. Through thematic analysis, the researchers identified four primary themes: contended and contested boundaries, complementary spaces, delineated spaces of simplicity and complexity, and social work under threat.
Regarding the utility of the intervention, participants recognized that social prescribing could serve as a useful resource and provide valuable support to clients. However, the study also highlights significant professional concerns. Participants expressed apprehension about overlapping professional boundaries and the potential for social prescribing to encroach upon the traditional scope of social work.
Specifically, social workers perceived social prescribing as being most appropriate for delivering support to individuals with low level needs. The findings suggest that while social workers play a significant role in referrals for social prescribing, the integration of these services remains a point of professional tension.
Limitations regarding the study design and specific follow-up were not reported. The findings highlight the importance of managing professional boundaries when integrating social prescribing into social work practice.