Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Virtual Reality methods improved reproductive health and family planning attitudes in women compared to face-to-face training

Virtual Reality methods improved reproductive health and family planning attitudes in women compared…
Photo by Vitaly Gariev / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider VR reinforcement for reproductive health education, noting lack of statistical precision and safety data.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 120 patients, with 40 in each of three groups, to assess Virtual Reality methods for reproductive health and family planning education. The population consisted of women. The intervention involved Virtual Reality methods combined with face-to-face training, while the comparator included face-to-face training alone and a control group. Follow-up and post-test data were collected to measure changes in reproductive health protective attitudes and family planning attitudes.

The main results indicated that the VR plus face-to-face group showed significantly greater improvements compared with face-to-face training and control groups. Specific absolute numbers, effect sizes, p-values, or confidence intervals were not reported for these outcomes. The direction of the effect was improvement in attitudes.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and general tolerability were not reported. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. The study indicates that VR reinforcement significantly enhances the effectiveness of traditional education, but limitations regarding missing statistical details and unreported safety data should be noted.

The practice relevance is that Virtual Reality methods may offer a valuable reinforcement tool for traditional education in reproductive health settings. Clinicians should interpret these findings with caution due to the lack of reported statistical precision and safety information.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 40
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of reproductive health and family planning (FP) education given to women using face-to-face (F2F) training and virtual reality (VR) methods. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study is a three-group, pretest-posttest, randomized, controlled experimental study. The study was conducted between September 2022 and July 2024. As a result of the power analysis to determine the sample size, the study was completed with two experimental groups, one control group, and 40 patients in each group, totaling 120 patients. "Sociodemographic Information Form," "Scale for Determining Reproductive Health Protective Attitudes of Women," and "Family Planning Attitude Scale" were used to collect the data. The data were analyzed using SPSS 27.0 software. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square, One-Way ANOVA, and repeated measures analysis of variance were used to evaluate the research data. RESULTS: Compared with F2F training and control groups, the VR + F2F group showed significantly greater improvements across reproductive health protective attitudes and FP attitudes at both follow-up and post-test. While F2Feducation also improved scores compared to the control group, the VR-augmented intervention resulted in the most substantial gains. The findings indicate that VR reinforcement significantly enhances the effectiveness of traditional education in improving women's attitudes toward reproductive health and FP. CONCLUSION: As a result, it was determined that the training given to women using VR applications increased reproductive health and FP knowledge and attitudes compared to F2F training and the control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05678829.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.