Parents of elementary-aged children in states with free school meals joined private Facebook groups to see if social media could help kids eat better. The study involved 832 families who received messages for six weeks. Some groups saw campaigns about school meals while others read about books. Researchers tracked how often children ate lunch and breakfast at school. They also watched how much parents noticed the messages and talked about them. The results showed parents in the meal groups noticed messages more and read them more than the control group. They also talked more with others about the topics. However, children did not eat more lunch or breakfast. The data showed no increase in lunch participation or breakfast participation. The campaign was safe with no reported side effects or dropouts. While the digital approach worked to get parents paying attention, it did not change what children ate at school. This suggests that simply sending messages to parents may not be enough to solve the problem of low meal participation.
Facebook campaign boosts awareness but not school meal uptake in childrenFacebook campaigns did not increase childrens school meal participation
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 832 parents of elementary-aged children living in states with Universal Free School Meal programs. The intervention group received a school meal promotion campaign delivered through private Facebook groups for 6 weeks, while the control group received a campaign about reading. The primary outcome was children's school lunch and school breakfast participation.
Results showed that the intervention significantly increased noticing of campaign messages by 37 percentage points (p<0.05) and improved reading scores by 0.16 on a 1-5 scale (p<0.05). Talking with others about campaign messages also increased by 0.14-0.21 on 1-5 scales (p<0.05). However, there was no significant increase in school lunch participation (0.08 meals/week, 95% CI -0.08 to 0.25, p=0.30) or school breakfast participation (0.02 meals/week, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.20, p=0.81).
Safety and tolerability were not reported. Limitations were not specified in the available data. The study suggests that while digital campaigns can raise awareness, they may not be sufficient to increase actual meal participation. Clinicians should consider additional strategies to support families in accessing school meals.