Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Mental Contrasting Intervention Improves Workplace Physical Activity but Not Snacking in Small RCTWorkplace mental exercise helped employees move more but not snack less in small study

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that a brief mental contrasting intervention may increase workplace physical activity but not reduce snacking, based on a small, short-term RCT.

A randomized controlled trial evaluated a mental contrasting with implementation intentions intervention over 2 weeks in 73 employees (516 total days). Participants were assigned to a daily-assignment intervention group (receiving daily refreshers focusing on either physical activity or unhealthy snacking), a daily-choice intervention group (choosing which behavior to focus on daily), or a passive control group. For secondary outcomes, the intervention successfully improved accelerometer-assessed physical activity, with participants in the daily-choice group being more physically active than those in the daily-assignment group. However, the intervention was ineffective at reducing unhealthy snacking at work. Within-person daily refreshers provided no evidence of additional benefit. Safety and tolerability were not reported. Key limitations include the small sample size, short 2-week duration, and lack of reported effect sizes, absolute numbers, or statistical measures for the main results. Exploratory analyses suggested the intervention might be more effective in work environments with higher job stressors and among individuals with higher baseline unhealthy snacking, but these findings require confirmation. The RCT design allows for causal inference for between-group comparisons. Given the small scale and preliminary nature, these results should be interpreted cautiously.

Researchers tested a mental exercise called 'mental contrasting with implementation intentions' to see if it could help employees be more physically active and snack less on unhealthy foods at work. The study involved 73 employees over 516 days. Some participants received daily prompts to focus on either activity or snacking, while others could choose their daily focus. A third group served as a passive control for comparison.

Over the two-week study period, the mental exercise successfully increased employees' physical activity, as measured by wearable accelerometers. The version where employees could choose which behavior to focus on each day worked better for increasing activity than the version where the focus was assigned. However, the intervention did not help reduce unhealthy snacking at work. Daily refreshers of the exercise did not provide any extra benefit.

This was a small, short-term study, so we don't know if the benefits for activity would last. The finding that the exercise didn't help with snacking is important. Some exploratory analysis suggested the approach might work better in more stressful jobs or for people who snack more, but these are just early observations that need confirmation. The study shows a simple mental planning tool might offer a small, short-term boost for workplace movement, but it's not a solution for changing eating habits based on this evidence.

What this means for you:
A brief mental planning exercise helped employees move more in a small study, but did not reduce unhealthy snacking.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up0.5 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Employees are often not sufficiently physically active and engage in unhealthy snacking during the workday. We address these unhealthy behaviors by evaluating an individual-level intervention based on the principle of mental contrasting with implementation intentions targeted at increasing physical activity and decreasing unhealthy snacking during the workday. In addition to evaluating intervention effectiveness (compared to a passive control group), we also contrast two intervention groups: Participants were either randomly allocated to refresher interventions focusing on physical activity versus unhealthy snacking each day (daily-assignment intervention group) or could decide which behavior to focus on each day (daily-choice intervention group). We employed a randomized controlled design within a daily diary study (73 employees, 516 days). Between-person results showed that the intervention successfully improved employees' accelerometer-assessed physical activity during the 2-week study phase. Moreover, participants in the daily-choice intervention group were more physically active than participants in the daily-assignment intervention group. Within-person results did not provide evidence of an additional benefit from daily intervention refreshers. The intervention was ineffective at reducing unhealthy snacking at work. Exploratory analyses suggested that the intervention was more effective in work environments characterized by higher levels of job stressors (for both physical activity and unhealthy snacking) and among individuals with higher baseline levels of unhealthy snacking. These findings highlight the potential of mental contrasting with implementation intention interventions in promoting health behaviors during the workday while suggesting that behavioral choice and individual boundary conditions (i.e., baseline levels and work context) can further enhance intervention effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.