This randomized controlled trial evaluated a brief behavioral Sleep Promotion Program (SPP) versus sleep monitoring alone in 40 adolescents aged 13-15 with insufficient and irregular sleep. The SPP intervention included sleep psychoeducation and one individual clinician session. Actigraphy data were collected during two periods, each lasting 1-2 weeks.
For the secondary outcome of sleep regularity, participants receiving SPP decreased the difference in weekend-weekday sleep onset by 54 minutes from baseline to Period 1 (β = 1.1, p = .03), indicating increased regularity. This improvement was maintained at Period 2. However, total sleep time (duration) did not change significantly as measured by actigraphy.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the small sample size of 40 participants and the fact that the sleep regularity finding comes from secondary outcome analysis. The authors note that this actigraphy-measured result on sleep duration differs from previously reported increases in self-reported sleep duration.
For clinical practice, this study suggests that regularizing sleep patterns may be an attainable first step in addressing adolescent sleep problems, though the intervention did not change objectively measured sleep duration. Future work is needed to test whether improved sleep regularity predicts adolescent health outcomes.
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: We previously developed a brief, behavioral intervention (Sleep Promotion Program, SPP) that demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and increased self-reported sleep. Here, we tested the effects of SPP on the trial's secondary outcomes: sleep duration, regularity, and timing as measured by actigraphy and conducted a secondary analysis of SPP's effects on rest-activity rhythms.
METHODS: Forty participants (ages 13-15) with insufficient and irregular sleep randomized to SPP-continuation (n = 22), or to sleep monitoring-SPP (n = 18), had analyzable actigraphy data. SPP included sleep psychoeducation and one individual clinician session. Participants wore an actigraph for 1-2 weeks during baseline, Period 1, and Period 2. We hypothesized SPP would lead to longer and more regular sleep from baseline to Period 1 compared to sleep monitoring that would be sustained at Period 2. We used multilevel models with a treatment by time interaction to test whether SPP improved sleep relative to sleep monitoring. We also compared sleep changes from Period 1 to Period 2 among participants randomized to SPP-continuation.
RESULTS: Participants receiving SPP decreased the difference in weekend-weekday sleep onset by 54-minute (β = 1.1; p = .03) from baseline to Period 1 (i.e., increased regularity). Increased regularity was maintained at Period 2. Total sleep time did not change significantly.
CONCLUSION: SPP regularized weekend-weekday sleep onset timing in adolescents with insufficient and irregular sleep but did not change actigraphic sleep duration, which differed from increases in self-reported sleep duration previously reported. Regularizing sleep may be an attainable first step to improving adolescent sleep. Future work is needed to test whether sleep regularity predicts adolescent health outcomes.
CLINICAL TRIALS: Targeted Intervention for Insufficient Sleep among Typically-Developing Adolescents (TAPAS); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04163003; NCT04163003.