This systematic review evaluates environmental exposures linked to atopic dermatitis risk. The scope includes microbe-related factors like antibiotics and helminth infections, pollution such as air pollution and PFAS, and lifestyle factors including smoking and pet exposure. The authors assessed methodological quality using AMSTAR 2 and focused on effect direction and statistical significance without recalculating original estimates.
Key findings indicate that antibiotic exposure and both active and passive smoking were consistently associated with increased atopic dermatitis risk in children. Prenatal exposure to PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide also elevated risk. In adults, smoking and air pollution showed stable positive associations. For mixed-age populations, PM10 exposure and urban residence were linked to higher atopic dermatitis risk.
Evidence for other exposures remained limited or inconsistent. These include PFAS, heavy metals, pesticides, helminth infection, pet exposure, light at night, and indoor fuel use. The authors note that data extraction prioritized fully adjusted estimates, dose–response relationships, and age-stratified findings, but not all details may be available. The review does not fabricate study-level details like sample sizes or effect sizes not present in the source.
Practice relevance suggests that antibiotic exposure, smoking, and air pollution are the most robust environmental risk factors for atopic dermatitis across age groups. Targeted interventions and environmental management may contribute to atopic dermatitis prevention and control. The source reports associations, not causation.
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disorder with a substantial global burden. Although multiple studies have investigated the impact of environmental exposures on AD, a comprehensive review integrating children, adults, and mixed-age populations is lacking. This study aimed to synthesise current evidence on environmental risk factors for AD and examine age-specific susceptibility.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to March 2026 for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on environmental exposures and AD risk. Exposures were categorised as: microbe- and immune-related factors (antibiotics and helminth infections), environmental pollution and chemicals (air pollution, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), heavy metals, pesticides), and lifestyle or residential factors (active and passive smoking, pet exposure, urban environment, light at night, indoor fuel use). Eligible studies reported pooled effect estimates including odds ratios (ORs), relative risks (RRs), or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or clear directional associations. Data extraction prioritised fully adjusted estimates, dose–response relationships, and age-stratified findings. Methodological quality was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2). Evidence synthesis focused on effect direction, statistical significance, heterogeneity (I2), and overlap of primary studies, without recalculating original estimates.ResultsTwenty systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included. In children, antibiotic exposure and both active and passive smoking were consistently associated with increased AD risk, while prenatal exposure to PM₂.₅ and nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) also elevated risk. In adults, smoking and air pollution showed stable positive associations. In mixed-age populations, PM₁₀ exposure and urban residence were linked to higher AD risk. Evidence for other exposures, including PFAS, heavy metals, pesticides, helminth infection, pet exposure, light at night, and indoor fuel use, remained limited or inconsistent.ConclusionAntibiotic exposure, smoking, and air pollution are the most robust environmental risk factors for AD across age groups, whereas other exposures require further investigation. Targeted interventions and environmental management may contribute to AD prevention and control.