Right unilateral and bitemporal ECT show similar symptom improvement in resistant schizophrenia
A randomized controlled trial compared two electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) electrode placements in 17 patients with resistant schizophrenia: right unilateral stimulation (RUS) versus bitemporal stimulation (BTS). The primary outcome was not reported; secondary outcomes included symptomatic changes, side effects, and cognitive performance. Both groups showed significant symptom improvement on the PANSS scale (BTS Δ44.75 vs. RUS Δ39.11, p=0.724), with response rates of 75% (6/8) for BTS and 44.4% (4/9) for RUS (p=0.335), indicating no statistically significant difference in efficacy.
RUS required significantly lower stimulus intensity to induce seizures (29.8 mC vs. 54 mC, p=0.003). Cognitive assessments revealed a statistically significant deterioration in verbal fluency in the BTS group (p=0.042) and an improvement in motor speed in the RUS group (p=0.046), though no global cognitive differences were detected between groups. Safety and tolerability data were not reported.
Key limitations include the very small sample size of 17 patients, lack of power calculation, and unspecified methodological limitations. The authors describe this as an exploratory study showing association only. These preliminary results with methodological limitations cannot establish definitive superiority of one technique. In clinical practice, both techniques appear similarly effective for symptom reduction in this population, but RUS may offer potential advantages in requiring lower stimulus and showing less deterioration in specific cognitive domains, though these findings require confirmation in larger, more robust studies.