Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Aerobic exercise and cognitive stimulation show no significant between-group cognitive benefits in schizophrenia trial

Aerobic exercise and cognitive stimulation show no significant between-group cognitive benefits in s…
Photo by Kaspars Eglitis / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret within-group improvements from small schizophrenia trial cautiously; between-group cognitive benefits were not significant.

A 12-week randomized controlled trial assigned 58 patients with schizophrenia to an aerobic exercise group (n=18), a computer-based cognitive stimulation group (n=20), or a control group (n=20) receiving no intervention. The primary outcomes assessed at 12 weeks included cognition, clinical symptoms, depression, and quality of life.

Between-group comparisons showed no statistically significant differences for general cognitive function, executive function, or depression. However, significant differences were observed for specific PANSS and quality of life subscales. Within-group analyses revealed improvements in general cognitive function, clinical symptoms, and selected quality of life domains for the aerobic exercise group. The cognitive stimulation group showed significant improvements across cognitive functions, clinical symptoms, depressive symptoms, and multiple quality of life domains. In contrast, the control group showed significant deterioration in cognitive functions, selected clinical symptoms, depressive symptoms, and certain quality of life domains.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the small sample size, which reduces statistical power and generalizability, and the lack of a sham or active control for the interventions, making it difficult to isolate specific treatment effects from non-specific factors like attention and engagement. The 2.8-month follow-up period is also relatively short for assessing sustained effects in a chronic condition.

For clinical practice, these findings suggest that structured non-pharmacological interventions may be associated with subjective or within-patient improvements, but they did not demonstrate clear superiority over no intervention in direct group comparisons for core cognitive outcomes. The observed deterioration in the control group highlights the potential importance of structured activity but requires confirmation in larger, more robustly controlled trials.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up2.8 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare of the effects of aerobic exercise (AE) and computer-based cognitive stimulation (CS) in terms of cognition, clinical symptoms, depression, and quality of life (QOL) in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: A total of 58 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia completed to the study (aerobic exercise group (AEG): n = 18, cognitive stimulation group (CSG): n = 20, control group (CG): n = 20). The AEG participated in a 12-week AE program, whereas the CSG engaged in computer-based CS over the same period. Also, the CG did not receive any intervention. Cognition with Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale and Frontal Assessment Battery, clinical symptoms with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, depression with Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia, and QOL with Quality of Life Scale for Schizophrenia Patients scale were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. RESULTS: Within-group improvements were observed in general cognitive function, clinical symptoms, and selected QOL domains in the AEG, whereas the CSG showed significant improvements across cognitive functions, clinical symptoms, depressive symptoms, and multiple QOL domains. In contrast, the CG exhibited significant deterioration in cognitive functions, selected clinical symptoms, depressive symptoms, and certain QOL domains over the 12-week period. Between-group comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences in general cognitive function, executive function, and depression at week 12. However, significant differences were observed in specific PANSS and QOL subscales. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggested that computer-based CS and AE may offer domain-specific and complementary effects in cognitive and clinical domains in PwS.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.