Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds moderate negative correlation between meaning in life and depression

Meta-analysis finds moderate negative correlation between meaning in life and depression
Photo by Bozhin Karaivanov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Interpret the moderate negative correlation between meaning in life and depression as observational, not causal.

A three-level meta-analysis synthesized evidence from 278 studies comprising 312 independent samples and 552 effect values, totaling 252,254 participants. The analysis examined the correlation between meaning in life and depression, though specific population characteristics, settings, and intervention/exposure details were not reported. The primary outcome was the correlation coefficient between these constructs.

The main result showed a moderately negative correlation between meaning in life and depression, with an effect size of r = -0.332 (p < 0.001). The relationship was found to be moderated by several variables, including the specific components of meaning in life being measured, the depression assessment tools used, the health status of participants, and the language of the study. No absolute numbers for clinical outcomes were reported.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key study limitations were not explicitly detailed in the provided information. The authors note the results are significant for psychological intervention in depression and may provide guidance for optimizing approaches. However, this is an observational correlation; the analysis cannot establish that enhancing meaning in life causes a reduction in depression. Clinical application should be restrained, recognizing this as evidence of association from a large body of correlational research.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Depression is a public health issue of global concern. Previously, many studies have analyzed the relationship between meaning in life and depression, but there are discrepancies in the conclusions of both theoretical discussions and empirical studies on the relationship between the two. Therefore, this study uses a three-level meta-analysis method to explore the relationship between the two and further analyze the moderator variables affecting the relationship. After literature retrieval and screening, 278 studies were finally included, covering 312 independent samples, 552 effect values, and a sample size of 252,254. The results showed that meaning in life was moderately negatively correlated with depression (r = -0.332, p < 0.001). The relationship between meaning in life and depression was moderated by components of meaning in life, depression measurement tools, health status, and language, but not by gender, age, individualism index, publication time, publication status, and research design. Further analysis of the moderating effects of each component of meaning in life on the relationship with depression found that age moderated the relationship between presence of meaning and depression, individualism index, individualism-collectivism, and language moderated the relationship between search for meaning and depression, and health status and language moderated the relationship between purpose in life and depression. The results of this study are significant for the psychological intervention of depression, which can provide guidance for optimizing intervention measures and help improve the intervention effect of meaning in life on depression.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.