Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Scoping review identifies operational and organizational drivers of burnout in public safety personnelWhy do we know so little about moral injury in first responders?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider organizational and operational factors when addressing burnout in public safety personnel; moral injury research remains limited.

A systematic scoping review analyzed 43 studies from nearly 13,000 identified publications examining burnout and moral injury in public safety personnel, including EMTs, firefighters, and emergency dispatchers. The review mapped environmental, relational, and operational drivers and processes associated with these conditions, without testing specific interventions or comparators.

Only 3 of the 43 included studies specifically examined moral injury. Most research focused on individual burnout factors such as age and gender, while key drivers identified included operational factors (occupational stress, organizational support) and non-organizational factors (traumatic events, work-family conflict). Burnout outcomes discussed primarily involved individual-level physical and mental health, job satisfaction, and turnover.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include the scarcity of moral injury research, predominant focus on individual rather than organizational drivers, and limited discussion of burnout outcomes. The review notes that systems-level contributors to burnout and moral injury are less often applied to public safety workers.

This scoping review identifies significant research gaps, particularly regarding moral injury and organizational drivers in public safety personnel. It suggests future research should address multi-level drivers to inform targeted interventions but does not provide quantitative risk estimates or test specific approaches.

When EMTs, firefighters, and dispatchers struggle, we often call it burnout. But a sweeping look at the research suggests we might be missing something deeper. A review of 43 studies found that while operational stress, traumatic events, and poor organizational support are consistently linked to burnout, the concept of moral injury—the psychological distress from violating one's own ethical code—was examined in just three of those studies. The research largely focused on individual factors like a person's age or gender, rather than the systemic workplace issues that might be fueling the crisis. This isn't a study that measured how common these problems are or tested any fixes. Instead, it's a map showing where the research is thin, especially around the profound ethical dilemmas these workers face. The findings point to a gap in our understanding: to truly help, we need to look beyond individual resilience and examine the organizational structures that may be setting people up to suffer.

What this means for you:
Research on first responders' burnout overlooks the deep wounds of moral injury.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Despite growing awareness of mental health, stress, and trauma among public safety workers (EMTs, firefighters, and emergency dispatchers), gaps remain in programs and research addressing burnout and moral injury -especially when compared to the attention given to healthcare professionals and, to some extent, police officers. The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature on the environmental, relational, and operational drivers, processes, and outcomes associated with burnout and moral injury among public safety personnel according to a national framework. A systematic search following PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines was conducted across six databases for peer-reviewed publications from 2004 to 2024. Search terms focused on burnout, moral injury, and public safety professions. Reference lists from included studies and key journals were also hand-searched. Identified studies were uploaded to Covidence and screened by three reviewers using defined criteria. Of nearly 13,000 articles identified, 43 were included. Only three studies examined moral injury. Most studies examined individual burnout factors (e.g., age, gender), with less attention to organizational drivers. Key drivers included operational factors (e.g., occupational stress, organizational support) and non-organizational factors (e.g., traumatic events, work-family conflict). Burnout outcomes, discussed in fewer studies, primarily related to individual-level physical and mental health or job satisfaction and turnover. Understanding burnout and moral injury from the perspective of public safety workers is critical to public health, given their frontline role during crises. While they safeguard the well-being of others, their own health has significant implications for downstream providers and patient outcomes. Although systems-level contributors to burnout and moral injury are increasingly acknowledged in broader healthcare, this lens is less often applied to public safety workers-especially in relation to moral injury. Addressing these issues requires a deeper understanding of their origins, particularly the organizational factors that shape how burnout and moral injury manifest in this workforce. Future research must address multi-level drivers to inform more effective and targeted interventions.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.