Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

LLM-enabled AI chatbots are primarily utilized for text-based, lower-acuity, and information-oriented health purposesAI Chatbots Show Potential for Managing Chronic Health Conditions

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that current LLM-enabled AI chatbot evidence is concentrated in lower-acuity, information-oriented contexts.

This scoping review analyzed 286 articles to map the empirical studies and evaluations of LLM-enabled AI chatbots for health purposes. The review identified that 267 (93.4%) of the examined models were general-purpose LLMs. The evidence is primarily centered on text-based chatbots rather than other modalities.

Findings indicate that public-facing applications include 4 primary purposes: seeking health information, symptom assessment and self-care management, emotional support, and preventive and transitional care support. For professional and organizational purposes, 6 areas were identified: clinical decision support, improving administrative efficiency, supporting patient interaction and doctor-patient communication, enhancing continuing education, facilitating health research, and institutional workflow support and care navigation.

Authors note that the current evidence base is concentrated in lower-acuity and information-oriented contexts, often relying on output evaluations or self-reported perceptions. Significant gaps exist in evidence regarding institutional integration, governance, and higher-stakes or longitudinal contexts. Furthermore, evidence is limited across diverse populations, languages, and interaction modalities. These findings provide a stakeholder-purpose mapping of current AI chatbot applications in healthcare.

How this fits prior evidence

This scoping review addresses a gap in the current landscape of AI-driven tools. While prior coverage noted that specialized models like Med-Diet outperformed general-purpose LLMs in dietary planning for noncommunicable diseases, this review highlights that the broader evidence base for LLM-enabled chatbots remains concentrated in lower-acuity, information-oriented contexts. It also notes that while mHealth interventions may improve eHealth literacy in chronic disease patients, the current evidence for AI chatbots specifically lacks depth in high-stakes and longitudinal contexts.

A scoping review of 286 articles explored how large language model (LLM) chatbots are being used in healthcare. The study looked at how these tools help both the general public and healthcare professionals. Most of the research focused on general-purpose, text-based chatbots.

For the public, these tools were used for finding health information, checking symptoms, and managing self-care. They also provided emotional support and helped with preventive care. For healthcare professionals, the tools were used to help with clinical decisions, improve office work, and help doctors communicate better with their patients.

Because this was a scoping review of existing literature, the findings are currently limited. Most evidence comes from text-based, lower-stakes situations. There is currently very little evidence regarding how these tools work in high-stakes medical situations or over long periods of time. You should talk to your doctor before using AI tools for medical decisions.

What this means for you:
AI chatbots are currently used mostly for information and administrative tasks rather than high-stakes medical care.

Common questions

What are AI chatbots used for in healthcare?

AI chatbots are used for several purposes. For the public, they help with finding health information, symptom assessment, and self-care management. For professionals, they are used for clinical decision support, improving administrative efficiency, and helping with doctor-patient communication.

Are these AI tools reliable for serious medical issues?

The current evidence is mostly focused on lower-acuity and information-oriented contexts. There is currently limited evidence regarding how these tools perform in higher-stakes medical situations or in long-term care settings.

What types of AI chatbots were studied?

The study found that 267 out of 286 articles (93.4%) focused on general-purpose LLMs. Most of these were text-based chatbots rather than other types of interaction.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Large Language Model (LLM)-enabled artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly shaping health communication by mediating how patients, health professionals, researchers, and health institutions seek, interpret, produce, and act on health information. Existing reviews have largely focused on a single stakeholder group or clinical domain, leaving unclear how these systems are applied and evaluated across stakeholder groups and health purposes. This scoping review mapped empirical studies of LLM-enabled AI chatbot applications and evaluations for health purposes across four stakeholder groups: the public or patients, health professionals, health researchers and students, and health institutions. We characterized the purposes and evidence patterns associated with these applications and evaluations. We searched nine databases for peer-reviewed, English-language empirical studies available through July 2025. After screening, 286 articles were coded for study characteristics, methodology, evidence type, chatbot modality, LLM type, health topic, stakeholder group, and health purpose. The included articles were published between 2023 and 2025. Most examined general-purpose LLMs (n = 267, 93.4%). Studies were concentrated in the United States and China and primarily examined text-based chatbots. Noncommunicable or chronic diseases and general health information were the most common health topics. Ten health-related purposes were identified across four stakeholder groups and two umbrella categories. Public-facing applications involved the general public or patients and encompassed four purposes: (1) seeking health information, (2) symptom assessment and self-care management, (3) emotional support, and (4) preventive and transitional care support. Professional and organizational applications involved health professionals, health researchers and students, and health institutions, and encompassed six purposes: (5) clinical decision support, (6) improving administrative efficiency, (7) supporting patient interaction and doctor–patient communication, (8) enhancing continuing education, (9) facilitating health research, and (10) institutional workflow support and care navigation. This review provides a stakeholder–purpose mapping of AI chatbot applications and evaluations in health care. The evidence base is concentrated in text-based, lower-acuity, and information-oriented contexts and derives primarily from output evaluations and self-reported perceptions or use. Key gaps concern institutional integration and governance, higher-stakes and longitudinal contexts, and evidence across populations, languages, and interaction modalities.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.