Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Generative AI maternal health chatbot did not improve anxiety or depression at 12 monthsAI Chatbot Does Not Reduce Anxiety for New Mothers

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that generative AI maternal health chatbots did not improve anxiety or depression scores at 12 months.

This randomized clinical trial enrolled 400 English-speaking pregnant or postpartum individuals from racial and/or ethnic minoritized groups. Participants were randomized to receive either access to a generative AI maternal health chatbot or an active control consisting of monthly children's books. The primary outcome was the assessment of anxiety and depression symptoms at 12 months using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

At the 12-month follow-up, there was no association with differences in anxiety scores (adjusted mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, -0.77 to 0.96) or depression scores (adjusted mean difference, -0.23; 95% CI, -1.05 to 0.59) between the intervention and control groups. Other secondary outcomes, including emergency department visits, postpartum care, and contraception use, also showed no association with differences.

Exploratory within-group analyses showed that higher chatbot engagement was associated with higher anxiety scores and longer sleep duration. A secondary 12-month end point analysis showed an association with more self-reported pregnancy-related complications, though this was not present in longitudinal analyses. Safety data were not reported. Because secondary and exploratory findings should be interpreted cautiously, the primary finding remains that the AI chatbot did not improve maternal mental health symptoms compared to the active control.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding contrasts with the RELAX digital intervention, which reduced anxiety and repetitive negative thinking in pregnant individuals. It also differs from the finding that a web-based mindfulness program lowered depression relapse in pregnant women. While these prior interventions showed efficacy, this trial indicates that a generative AI chatbot did not produce similar improvements in anxiety or depression for the studied population.

Researchers conducted a randomized clinical trial to see if a generative AI maternal health chatbot could help new mothers. The study included 400 English-speaking pregnant or postpartum individuals from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. These parents were caring for infants younger than six months old.

After 12 months, the results showed no significant difference in anxiety or depression scores between the group that used the AI chatbot and the group that received monthly children's books. Other measures, such as emergency department visits, postpartum care checkups, and contraception use, also showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Some exploratory findings showed that higher engagement with the chatbot was linked to both longer sleep and higher anxiety scores. However, these specific results should be viewed with caution as they were not part of the primary study goals. Currently, there is no evidence that an AI chatbot is more effective than traditional materials for managing maternal mental health.

What this means for you:
An AI chatbot did not improve anxiety or depression in new mothers compared to receiving children's books.

Common questions

Does an AI chatbot help with postpartum anxiety?

The study found no significant difference in anxiety scores between mothers who used a generative AI chatbot and those who received children's books. While some higher engagement with the chatbot was linked to higher anxiety scores in an exploratory analysis, the primary results showed no overall improvement in mental health symptoms over 12 months.

Who was included in this study?

The study included 400 English-speaking pregnant or postpartum individuals. These participants were from racial and ethnic minoritized groups and were caring for infants younger than 6 months old. The study took place online across 49 states and the District of Columbia.

Were there any other benefits found from using the AI chatbot?

The study found no significant differences in emergency department visits, postpartum care checkups, or contraception use. While an exploratory analysis showed a link between higher chatbot engagement and longer sleep, these findings should be interpreted cautiously as they were not the primary focus of the trial.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 400
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up12.0 mo
PublishedNov 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IMPORTANCE: Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly used to support maternal health, but randomized evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether access to a generative AI maternal health chatbot improved 12-month maternal health outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 2-group randomized clinical trial enrolled 400 participants from October 2023 to December 2024, with 12-month follow-up completed in December 2025. Participants were recruited online across 49 US states and the District of Columbia. Eligible participants were English-speaking, aged 14 years or older, pregnant or parenting an infant younger than 6 months, and self-identified as members of racial and/or ethnic minoritized groups. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive access to the chatbot or an active control consisting of monthly children's books. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were anxiety and depression symptoms at 12 months measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, pregnancy-related complications, postpartum care checkups, effective contraception use, and sleep duration. RESULTS: Among 400 randomized participants, the mean (SD) age was 32.6 (5.1) years; 200 (50%) were parenting an infant at enrollment; and 10 (2%) identified as American Indian or Alaska Native, 80 (20%) Asian, 188 (47%) Black or African American, 57 (14%) multiracial, and 65 (16%) Hispanic or Latino. The AI chatbot was not associated with differences in anxiety scores (adjusted mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, -0.77 to 0.96) or depression scores (adjusted mean difference, -0.23; 95% CI, -1.05 to 0.59), nor with emergency department visits, postpartum care, contraception use, or sleep duration. Among participants pregnant at enrollment, the chatbot was associated with more self-reported pregnancy-related complications in the secondary 12-month end point analysis, but not in longitudinal analyses. Higher chatbot engagement was associated with longer sleep duration and higher anxiety scores in exploratory within-group analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial of pregnant and postpartum individuals from racial and ethnic minoritized groups, access to a generative artificial intelligence maternal health chatbot did not improve maternal anxiety or depression at 12 months compared with an active control. Secondary and exploratory findings should be interpreted cautiously. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06053515.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.