Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Mass Gathering Preparedness Requires Integrated EMS and Hospital Surge CapacityBetter ways to manage medical emergencies at large public events

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider mass gathering preparedness as an integrated EMS-hospital continuum, not separate plans.

This structured narrative review examines the integration of emergency medical services (EMS) and hospital surge capacity for mass gatherings. It covers staffing, supplies, space, and systems, drawing on 41 papers. The review does not report a pooled effect size or de novo meta-analysis.

Among the 41 papers, medical-doctor presence was the most commonly reported element (34/41, 82.9%). Medication interventions, procedural interventions, and mobile treatment spaces each appeared in 23/41 papers (56.1%). Health-support systems were reported in 18/41 (43.9%), and temporary structures in 21/41 (51.2%). Patient-presentation rates averaged 6.2 per 1,000 attendees, and transport-to-hospital rates averaged 0.35 per 1,000 attendees. Emergency-department changes varied widely, from 7.5% to 83%.

The authors describe the evidence base as heterogeneous, with inconsistent denominators across studies. They note that the clinical effectiveness of digital integration remains insufficiently validated, and that digital integration results are only from simulations. No pooled estimates were produced.

Practice relevance centers on treating preparedness as an integrated continuum rather than separate event-site and hospital plans. Safety outcomes, adverse events, and follow-up were not reported. Funding and conflicts of interest were not reported.

When thousands of people gather at a concert or festival, medical teams face a massive challenge. They must decide how to treat patients on-site while ensuring that local hospitals are not overwhelmed. This study looks at how to bridge the gap between the event site and the hospital to create a smoother flow of care.

The review looked at 41 different papers to see what works. It found that many sites use doctors on-site, mobile treatment spaces, and temporary structures to provide immediate care. These tools help manage the flow of patients. For example, the data shows that while many people might need medical attention at a large event, only a small fraction actually require transport to a hospital.

However, the evidence is still mixed. Because the data comes from many different types of events, it can be hard to see exactly how well certain systems work every time. Also, while digital tools are being tested to help coordinate these efforts, they have mostly been tested in simulations rather than real-world scenarios.

What this means for you:
Linking emergency services directly with hospital resources helps manage patient flow at large public events.

Common questions

What kind of medical care is usually available at large events?

Many events use a mix of resources to treat people on-site. This includes having doctors present, using mobile treatment spaces, and setting up temporary structures. These methods help provide immediate care and determine who needs to be moved to a hospital.

How many people typically need hospital transport at large events?

The data shows that while there may be 6.2 medical presentations for every 1,000 attendees, the rate of transport to a hospital is much lower, at 0.35 per 1,000 attendees.

Are there any risks or limitations to these emergency systems?

The evidence is currently varied because different events use different systems. Additionally, while digital tools are being explored to help coordinate care, their effectiveness has mostly been tested in simulations rather than in real-world settings.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Mass gatherings can generate concentrated, time-dependent demand across in-event health services, municipal emergency medical services (EMS), emergency departments, and inpatient services. Evidence relevant to preparedness is heterogeneous and is often reported with inconsistent denominators, limiting direct comparison. This structured narrative review synthesizes published evidence on EMS and hospital surge-capacity integration across the four surge domains of staff, stuff/supplies, space, and systems. The review retained the original structured search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for 2010-February 2026 and incorporated a focused PubMed and citation update through September 2026. Because the purpose is interpretive synthesis rather than exhaustive effect estimation, no de novo meta-analysis or pooled estimates were produced; quantitative findings are reported with the denominators and analytic context used by the source publications. A 2025 scoping review of 41 papers reported medical-doctor presence in 34/41 papers (82.9%), medication interventions in 23/41 (56.1%), procedural interventions in 23/41 (56.1%), health-support systems in 18/41 (43.9%), mobile treatment spaces in 23/41 (56.1%), and temporary structures in 21/41 (51.2%). That review reported median calculated patient-presentation and transport-to-hospital rates of 6.2 and 0.35 per 1,000 attendees, respectively, whereas a separate 22-article stadium review reported much lower medians when standardized per 10,000 spectators. Hospital effects were directionally heterogeneous: a 14-study systematic review found event-associated emergency-department changes ranging from 7.5%–37% decreases to increases as high as 83% in specific settings. Digital integration has shown promising simulated gains, but clinical effectiveness remains insufficiently validated. Preparedness is best treated as an integrated continuum rather than as separate event-site and hospital plans. Standardized denominators, linked patient-level data, context-specific resource design, and prospective evaluation are priorities.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.