Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy significantly reduces depressive symptoms compared to all other treatment typesLong-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Reduces Symptoms for People with Depression

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy as a high-certainty intervention to reduce depressive symptoms.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (LTPP), defined as 9 months or 30 sessions, for treating depression. The analysis included 1992 patients and compared LTPP against all comparators, active treatments, and active controls.

The meta-analysis found significant reductions in depressive symptoms for LTPP compared to all comparators (SMD=0.34; 95% CI [0.20, 0.47]). When compared specifically to active treatments, LTPP showed significant reductions (SMD=0.27; 95% CI [0.1, 0.45]). Comparisons against active controls showed larger effects (SMD=0.61), though the certainty of evidence for this specific comparison was very-low.

Several limitations were noted, including a risk of bias in most included studies and limited evidence regarding functional outcomes, economic impact, and long-term maintenance. Moderator analyses were also limited by small study numbers. Clinical recommendations for LTPP in reducing depressive symptoms are strong, but the recommendation for LTPP compared to active controls is weak due to low certainty of evidence.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis extends the evidence base for psychological and behavioral interventions for depression, specifically focusing on long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. It builds upon the finding that psychological and behavioral interventions significantly reduce depression severity in people with epilepsy. While the current study provides high-certainty evidence for LTPP compared to all trials, it notes limited evidence for functional outcomes and long-term maintenance.

A review of data from nearly 2,000 patients found that long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (LTPP) is effective for managing depression. This specific type of therapy involves at least 30 sessions and lasts for nine months or longer. The study compared this approach against various other treatments and control groups.

The results showed that LTPP led to significant reductions in depressive symptoms. When compared to active treatments, the reduction was clear. When compared to active controls, the effects were even larger. These findings suggest that consistent, long-term talk therapy can be a helpful tool for those living with depression.

While the results are promising, the evidence for comparing LTPP to certain control groups is not very strong. Additionally, there is currently limited information regarding how this therapy affects daily functioning, long-term maintenance, or economic impacts. Because of these gaps, it is best to discuss these specific treatment options with a healthcare provider to see if it fits your personal needs.

What this means for you:
Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy shows significant results in reducing symptoms for people with depression.

Common questions

What is long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy?

Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (LTPP) is a form of talk therapy that lasts for at least 9 months and includes at least 30 sessions. This study looked at how this specific duration of therapy helps patients manage symptoms of depression compared to other types of treatment.

How effective is this treatment for depression?

The study found that LTPP led to significant reductions in depressive symptoms. When compared to other active treatments, it showed a measurable reduction. When compared to active controls, the results showed even larger effects in reducing symptoms for the patients involved.

Are there any limitations to these findings?

While the results for symptom reduction are promising, there is limited evidence regarding how this therapy affects long-term maintenance or daily functioning. Additionally, the evidence for comparing LTPP to certain control groups was considered to be of very low certainty.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,992
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up9.0 mo
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
This pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023490547) evaluated the effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (LTPP) in reducing depressive symptoms using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and updated empirically supported treatment (EST) criteria. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through January 16, 2025. Sixteen randomized controlled trials involving 1992 participants met inclusion criteria (LTPP ≥9 months, ≥30 sessions), encompassing varied populations, psychodynamic modalities, and comparator conditions. Effects were pooled using two- or three-level random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. At treatment completion, LTPP showed significant reductions in depressive symptoms compared to all comparators (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI [0.20, 0.47]) and to active treatments specifically (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI [0.1, 0.45]). Effects were generally sustained at follow-up. Subgroup analyses revealed larger effects when LTPP was compared to active controls (SMD = 0.61), but with greater heterogeneity and very low certainty of evidence. GRADE assessments indicated high-certainty evidence for depressive symptom outcomes in the all-trials condition and moderate-certainty evidence in comparisons with active treatments. According to updated EST criteria, these findings support a Strong recommendation for LTPP in reducing depressive symptoms. However, limited evidence on functional outcomes, economic impact, and long-term maintenance precluded a Very Strong recommendation. Evidence from comparisons with active controls was of very-low certainty, supporting only a Weak recommendation. Risk of bias was a concern in most studies. Moderator analyses were prevented by small study numbers. Future individual patient data meta-analyses are needed to identify predictors of treatment response and to establish which subgroups of patients with depression are most suitable candidates for LTPP. Funding: Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.