Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Evaluating Digital and In-Person Interventions for Migrant Mental Health in ItalyTrial to Test Self-Help Mental Health Support for Migrants

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
This protocol evaluates in-person and online interventions for depressive and anxiety symptoms in Italian migrants.

This randomized hybrid type-I effectiveness-implementation study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two distinct psychological interventions for adult migrants resettled in Italy. The study targets individuals experiencing elevated psychological distress, specifically focusing on the reduction of depressive and anxiety symptoms.

The intervention groups include in-person Self-Help Plus (SH+) and an online version of Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM) supplemented with a booster session. These are compared against a psychological placebo group that lacks active intervention ingredients to establish a clear baseline for treatment efficacy.

Primary outcomes are measured at three months post-randomization using the Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary outcomes include assessments of mental health status, daily functioning, wellbeing, quality of life, and self-stigma, alongside an analysis of the costs associated with care.

As this is a study protocol, specific results regarding symptom reduction or cost-effectiveness are not yet available. The study design provides a framework for determining which delivery method—in-person or digital—best serves the needs of migrant populations facing significant psychological challenges in a new country.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in interventions for specific populations, such as migrants with psychological distress. It follows a similar design to the ongoing RCT protocol testing a 6-week dCBT program for adolescents, which also currently lacks available efficacy or safety data. Unlike the established findings for acupuncture plus antidepressants or probiotics for depression, no results are available for this study to confirm or contrast with existing evidence.

A new trial in Italy will test two self-help programs for adult migrants who are dealing with elevated psychological distress. The programs are Self-Help Plus, which is delivered in person, and Doing What Matters in Times of Stress, which is delivered online. Each includes an extra booster session. A third group will receive a psychological placebo without active ingredients.

The trial plans to include 237 people. The main measure is depressive and anxiety symptoms at 3 months after randomization, using the Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety and Depression Scale. The trial will also look at functioning, wellbeing, quality of life, self-stigma, and the cost of care.

This is a study protocol, which means it describes the plan for a trial. No results are available yet. The protocol does not report safety information, funding, or conflicts of interest.

Readers should treat this as an early step, not evidence that these programs work. The trial has not yet produced findings, so it cannot show whether the programs help or are safe. Results will be needed before anyone can draw conclusions.

What this means for you:
This is a trial plan only. No results yet on whether these self-help programs help migrants.

Common questions

What is this study testing?

It is testing two self-help programs for adult migrants in Italy with elevated psychological distress. One is Self-Help Plus, given in person. The other is Doing What Matters in Times of Stress, given online. Both include an extra booster session. A third group gets a psychological placebo without active ingredients.

Are there any results yet?

No. This is a study protocol, which describes the plan for a trial. The trial has not reported results, so there is no evidence yet on whether the programs help or are safe. Findings will come later.

Who is in the study?

The trial plans to include 237 adult migrants resettled in Italy who have elevated psychological distress. The main measure is depressive and anxiety symptoms at 3 months after randomization. The trial also plans to look at functioning, wellbeing, quality of life, self-stigma, and cost of care.

What are the side effects?

The protocol does not report adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability. Because no results are available, there is no information yet on side effects. Anyone with concerns about mental health treatment should talk with a doctor.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Migrant populations are exposed to multiple psychosocial stressors throughout the migration process, increasing their risk for common mental health conditions. There is increasing evidence for psychological interventions amongst migrants, although intervention effects tend to attenuate over time and efficacy against placebo is unknown. At the same time, implementation science questions are becoming critical, such as the benefits of in-person and online psychological interventions. We present a study protocol for a randomized hybrid type-I effectiveness-implementation study that will enroll adult migrants resettled in Italy who experience elevated psychological distress. Participants (n = 237) will be randomized to receive either in-person Self-Help Plus (SH+) or online Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM). We will assess the performance of both SH + and DWM with an additional booster session, and will compare them against a psychological placebo without active intervention ingredients. An intention-to-treat analysis using linear mixed models will be conducted to explore interventions’ effects on depressive and anxiety symptoms at 3 months following randomization as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety and Depression Scale, and to explore a set of implementation outcomes. We will also measure depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, mental health status, functioning, wellbeing, cost associated with care, quality of life, and self-stigma as secondary outcomes. The study protocol, informed consent procedures, and data protection measures were approved by the Comitato Etico Territoriale (CET) Area Sud Ovest Veneto (Approval ID n. 68505). The results of the present trial will be disseminated through the ADVANCE policy and scaling up strategy, in peer-reviewed journals, and at international and national scientific meetings.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.