Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis of voice acoustic parameters in depression finds nonsignificant frequency difference

Meta-analysis of voice acoustic parameters in depression finds nonsignificant frequency difference
Photo by Logan Voss / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that voice acoustic parameters show a nonsignificant difference in fundamental frequency in depression, with limited evidence.

This is a meta-analysis reviewing the use of voice acoustic parameters as biomarkers for depression. The scope included 17 publications, with only six providing sufficient data for quantitative synthesis on fundamental frequency (fo).

The authors synthesized a nonsignificant decrease in fundamental frequency among participants with depression compared to a control group. The pooled effect size was a mean difference of 1.82 Hz (p-value = 0.58). Other acoustic parameters could not be quantitatively synthesized due to a lack of extractable values.

Key limitations noted by the authors include that only six of the 17 included studies reported sufficient numerical fundamental frequency data for meta-analysis. The review does not report on study settings, follow-up periods, or safety data.

The authors suggest that voice acoustic parameters may have potential as noninvasive, cost-effective biomarkers for measuring and monitoring depression symptomatology. However, the nonsignificant result and limited data underscore the need for further research before clinical application.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Depression is a prevalent mental health disorder that significantly impairs psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Recent advances in health sciences and digital technologies have highlighted the potential of voice acoustic parameters as objective indicators of health status, including depression. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis, systematic literature review, and meta-analysis were conducted to consolidate and critically evaluate the current evidence regarding the relationship between voice acoustic parameters and depression. The search was performed in January 2024 across seven databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were included if they involved participants with clinically significant depression, identified either through formal diagnostic criteria or through validated depression rating scales with established clinical thresholds and explicitly reported voice acoustic parameters. A total of 31 potential publications were identified and analyzed, and after full-text reading, 17 publications were included. Only six out of the 17 included studies reported sufficient numerical fundamental frequency (fo) data for meta-analysis; other parameters could not be synthesized quantitatively due to a lack of extractable values. RESULTS: The bibliometric analysis suggests an evolution from studies identifying "valid" assessment tools towards the modeling of potential discriminatory factors. The mean difference (MD) suggests a decreased fo of 1.82 Hz among participants identified with depression compared to participants identified as the control group. However, the difference between the groups was not statistically significant ( test = 0.58; -value 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Voice acoustic parameters seem to have the potential to be noninvasive, cost-effective biomarkers for measuring and monitoring depression symptomatology. Although there was a trend of decreased fo of 1.82 Hz among participants identified with depression compared to participants identified as the control group, the meta-analysis suggests a nonsignificant difference in average values.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.