Imagine an older loved one with heart disease going in for a routine surgery, only to emerge confused, agitated, and not themselves. This condition, called postoperative delirium, is a serious and common risk for this group, affecting about 1 in 6 patients in this study. Until now, doctors haven't had a reliable way to predict who it will happen to. This research aimed to build that prediction tool. Using data from 861 elderly patients with coronary heart disease who had non-heart surgeries, scientists developed several computer models to forecast the risk of delirium. The best-performing model was highly accurate at spotting who was likely to develop this complication. It did this by analyzing seven key factors about a patient. The most important predictors were a person's level of physical frailty, their score on a simple memory test, and how severe their insomnia was. The researchers created an easy-to-use calculator based on this model. While the tool looks promising, the study notes it needs to be tested in other hospitals before it can be widely used to help doctors plan safer care for at-risk seniors.
GBM model predicts postoperative delirium in elderly CHD patients with 0.856 AUCCan a computer model predict post-surgery confusion in older heart patients? A new tool shows promise
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This retrospective cohort study aimed to develop a machine learning-based predictive model for postoperative delirium (POD) in elderly patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing non-cardiac surgery, as this population is at significantly increased risk and no specific prediction method exists. Data from elderly CHD patients were collected and split into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm, LASSO regression, and multiple logistic regression. Ten machine learning models were constructed and compared. A total of 861 patients were included, with a POD incidence of 16.6% (143/861). Seven key predictive features were identified. Among the ten models, the gradient boosting model (GBM) demonstrated superior performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the GBM was 0.856 (95% confidence interval: 0.796-0.916). The model also showed relatively good performance on decision curve analysis, calibration curve, specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, F1 score, and Brier score. Shapley additive interpretation (SHAP) plots indicated that higher Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) grade, lower Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and higher Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) score were significant predictors that enhanced the model's ability. Based on the GBM model, the researchers developed an easy-to-use calculator for predicting POD risk. The study concludes by stating the developed GBM model is reliable for predicting POD in this population but requires external validation before clinical application. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500097325) on 17/02/2025.