Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis links intolerance of uncertainty to depression in children and adolescents

Systematic review and meta-analysis links intolerance of uncertainty to depression in children and…
Photo by Annie Spratt / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note positive cross-sectional association between intolerance of uncertainty and depression in youth.

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and depression among children and adolescents. The evidence base consisted of 20 studies drawn from general population samples, such as typically developing individuals without significant medical needs. The primary outcome assessed the cross-sectional association between intolerance of uncertainty and depression.

The analysis reported an overall effect size of r = 0.47 for cross-sectional associations between intolerance of uncertainty and depression. When the study utilized child-friendly measures, the effect size decreased to r = 0.37. Additionally, the inhibitory intolerance of uncertainty subscale demonstrated a stronger association with depression than the prospective intolerance of uncertainty subscale, although specific effect sizes for this comparison were not reported.

Longitudinal findings within the review suggested that the association between intolerance of uncertainty and depression persists over time. The authors acknowledge limitations including that included studies were limited to those published in English. They also caution that effect sizes may be overestimated by the use of intolerance of uncertainty measures that are not child-friendly. Future research can further extend the evidence-base through careful measure selection, as well as longitudinal and experimental designs.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Intolerance of uncertainty (IU) is a development and maintenance factor for depression and anxiety. Previous reviews found that it associated with anxiety in children and adolescents. However, there was insufficient evidence at the time to review its association with depression in this population. METHOD: 20 studies investigating the relationship between IU and depression in children and adolescents were identified. Random effects meta-analysis was used to aggregate cross-sectional associations, with age, gender, and measure as moderators. A narrative review of longitudinal findings from relevant studies (K = 6) was also conducted. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of cross-sectional associations found an overall effect size of r = 0.47. There was limited evidence that age or gender moderated the effect, however there was a significant moderating effect of measure. Namely, when including studies using 'child-friendly' measures (i.e., developed and normed with children as opposed to adults), the effect size was r = 0.37. Another analysis revealed that the inhibitory IU subscale was more strongly associated with depression than prospective IU. Longitudinal findings suggested that the association between IU and depression persists over time. LIMITATIONS: Studies were limited to those published in English and including general population samples (e.g., typically developing, without significant medical needs). CONCLUSIONS: There is a medium-strong association between IU and depression symptoms in children and adolescents. However, it may be overestimated by the use of IU measures that are not child-friendly. Future research can further extend the evidence-base through careful measure selection, as well as longitudinal and experimental designs.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.