Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Phase 2 trial finds no significant PFS benefit adding SABR to nivolumab in advanced NSCLCDoes adding targeted radiation to immunotherapy help advanced lung cancer?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret phase 2 results of nivolumab plus SABR in advanced NSCLC with caution due to study underpowering.

This phase 2 randomized controlled trial enrolled 50 immunotherapy-naïve adults with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progressing after first- or second-line chemotherapy. Participants were randomized to receive nivolumab 240 mg every 2 weeks alone (n=16) or in combination with a single fraction of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) at 18-20 Gy (n=34). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, which was 49% in the combination arm versus 44% in the nivolumab-alone arm (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36-1.27; P = .23). The objective tumor response rate was 24% (8/34) with the combination and 25% (4/16) with nivolumab alone. Overall survival data were not reported, though the hazard ratio was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.43-1.75; P = .69). Safety profiles were similar between groups, with grade 3-5 adverse event rates of 77% (24/31) in the experimental arm and 75% (12/16) in the control arm. Key limitations include the study's early closure due to slow accrual, which prevented it from reaching its planned sample size of 120 participants, and a baseline imbalance in the percentage of female participants (56% in control vs 35% in experimental arm). In practice, these results from an underpowered trial do not support a clear efficacy advantage for adding SABR to nivolumab in this population, and the combination demonstrated similar, not superior, safety.

When standard chemotherapy stops working for advanced lung cancer, doctors and patients are searching for the next best option. A new study tested whether adding a precise, high-dose radiation treatment—called stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR)—to the immunotherapy drug nivolumab could help. The idea was to use radiation to 'wake up' the immune system against the cancer.

The trial involved 50 adults whose metastatic non-small cell lung cancer had progressed after one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab alone or nivolumab plus a single dose of SABR targeted at one tumor site. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the key finding was that the combination did not significantly improve the main goal of keeping the cancer from progressing at six months. Rates of tumor shrinkage and overall survival were also similar between the two groups.

Importantly, the rates of serious side effects were high and comparable in both groups, affecting about three-quarters of patients. A major caveat is that the study had to stop enrolling patients early, so it ended up with far fewer participants than planned. This means the trial was underpowered—it may have missed detecting a real, but small, benefit or difference. The results show the two approaches had similar effectiveness and safety in this limited test, but a larger study would be needed for a clearer conclusion.

What this means for you:
Adding targeted radiation to immunotherapy showed no clear extra benefit in this small, early lung cancer trial.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 16
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up0.5 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: Programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors have improved metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis. Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) may enhance immunity. This study evaluated the activity and safety of adding SABR to first-line immunotherapy post chemotherapy with nivolumab for metastatic NSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: NIVORAD (ALTG14/002/CT0135/TROG 16.01) randomized adults (1:2) to nivolumab 240 mg 2-weekly until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity either alone, or with single fraction SABR (18-20 Gy). Eligible patients had metastatic NSCLC, had progressed after 1-2 lines of chemotherapy, were immunotherapy-naïve, and had a disease site suitable for SABR. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were objective tumor response rate, overall survival, PFS at 1 and 2 years, and adverse events (AEs). The planned sample size of 120 was to provide 80% power with a 1-sided type 1 error rate of 5% to distinguish the observed proportions alive and progression free at 6 months. The study closed early because of slow accrual. RESULTS: Fifty participants were recruited and randomly assigned to nivolumab alone (n = 16) or nivolumab plus SABR (n = 34). Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment arms, apart from percentage of females which was higher in the control arm (56% vs 35%). Median follow-up was 26 months. PFS was similar among those assigned nivolumab plus SABR versus nivolumab alone (PFS at 6 months 49% vs 44%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36-1.27; P = .23). Objective tumor response rate (8/34[24%] vs 4/16[25%]) and overall survival (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.43-1.75; P = .69) were also similar in the 2 treatment groups. Rates of serious grade 3-5 AE (12/16 (75%) vs 24/31 (77%) in experimental arm) were also similar in the 2 groups. There were 2 deaths, 1 in each treatment group (pneumonitis and respiratory failure). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab plus SABR demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to nivolumab alone in metastatic NSCLC progressing after chemotherapy, without increased AEs.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.