Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective Study Shows 3D ResNeXt Classifier Distinguishes NTM-LD from PTB in 409 Patients

Retrospective Study Shows 3D ResNeXt Classifier Distinguishes NTM-LD from PTB in 409 Patients
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider external validation warranted before applying this classifier to differentiate NTM-LD from pulmonary tuberculosis.

This retrospective cohort study assessed the diagnostic performance of a 3D ResNeXt-based deep learning classifier applied to chest CT imaging. The population consisted of 409 patients with microbiologically confirmed diagnoses of Non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease or Pulmonary tuberculosis. Follow-up duration was not reported. Study setting was not reported. Publication type was abstract.

The primary outcome was differentiation of NTM-LD from PTB. In the training set of 329 patients, the model achieved an AUC of 0.89 and accuracy of 0.89. In the test set of 80 patients, the AUC was 0.83 and accuracy was 0.84. The classifier demonstrated statistically significant superiority compared to ResNet, SENet, DenseNet, ShuffleNet, Transformer, and Swin Transformer architectures. P-values and confidence intervals were not reported for these comparisons.

Safety data regarding adverse events were not reported. Key limitations include the retrospective design and the need for prospective multicenter validation. The evidence holds promise as a valuable clinical decision-support tool, but external validation is required. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously given the study design. Funding or conflicts were not reported. Certainty is limited by external validation needs.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Differentiating non-tuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTM-LD) from pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) remains a significant clinical challenge owing to their overlapping clinical and imaging features, despite markedly different therapeutic strategies. A total of 409 patients with microbiologically confirmed diagnoses were retrospectively enrolled and randomly divided into a training set (n = 329; NTM-LD: 171, PTB: 158) and an independent test set (n = 80; NTM-LD: 41, PTB: 39). After lung segmentation with nnU-Net, images were intensity-normalized and resampled to 256 × 256 × 128 voxels. A 3D ResNeXt-based classifier was developed and compared against six mainstream deep learning architectures: ResNet, SENet, DenseNet, ShuffleNet, Transformer, and Swin Transformer. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. The proposed 3D ResNeXt model achieved the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.89 and accuracy of 0.89 on the training set, and an AUC of 0.83 and accuracy of 0.84 on the independent test set. DeLong’s test confirmed statistically significant superiority over all six comparator architectures on the test set (all p  The 3D ResNeXt model demonstrated superior and interpretable performance in differentiating NTM-LD from PTB on chest CT. It holds promise as a valuable clinical decision-support tool, although prospective multicenter validation is warranted.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.