Subcutaneous tislelizumab shows comparable trough concentrations to intravenous dosing in treatment-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.
This phase I trial investigated the pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous tislelizumab compared to intravenous administration in treatment-naive patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The intervention involved subcutaneous injections at 300 mg, administered either in the abdomen or thigh, compared against intravenous dosing at 200 mg. The primary focus was on pharmacokinetic parameters such as trough concentrations and bioavailability, while secondary outcomes included efficacy metrics like overall response rate and safety profiles including immunogenicity.
The trial reported that subcutaneous administration resulted in geometric mean trough concentrations that were higher than those observed with intravenous dosing. Bioavailability was substantial at both injection sites, with the thigh site showing slightly higher values than the abdomen. Efficacy data indicated an overall response rate, while the median duration of response and progression-free survival had not yet been reached at the time of reporting. Safety assessments noted no new signals or injection-site reactions, with tolerability consistent with previous studies.
The authors highlight that efficacy results are preliminary and based on a small sample size. Additionally, there was no direct comparison of subcutaneous versus intravenous efficacy. The study design was multicenter and open-label. The authors suggest that subcutaneous delivery offers potential advantages in convenience and resource utilization. Given the preliminary nature of the data, clinicians should interpret these findings with caution until further validation is available.