Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Case report suggests second primary glioblastoma in ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patient treated with ensartinib and lorlatinibA single patient case warns doctors to check for second cancers when tumors act strangely

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider second primary glioblastoma in ALK+ lung cancer patients with atypical intracranial lesion progression.

This publication is a case report and literature review focusing on a single patient with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was a 63-year-old female who underwent radical resection and received adjuvant ensartinib and lorlatinib combined with stereotactic radiotherapy. She subsequently underwent surgical resection of a new lesion.

The patient developed progressive left-sided limb weakness and continuous lesion progression. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of primary glioblastoma. The patient died 10 months after the glioblastoma diagnosis. No adverse events or tolerability data were reported for the medications used.

The authors highlight that new intracranial lesions in patients with malignancies may warrant consideration of a second primary cancer, particularly when the treatment response is not consistent with the expected biology of the original tumor. Timely pathological confirmation and multidisciplinary review may help reduce diagnostic delay and improve treatment selection. This report underscores the importance of distinguishing between brain metastasis and second primary malignancies in this clinical context.

A 63-year-old woman with lung adenocarcinoma faced a confusing medical mystery. Her doctors saw a new lesion in her brain and assumed it was cancer spreading from her lungs. However, the tumor grew in a way that did not match the expected behavior of her original disease. This unusual pattern raised a critical question: was this a metastasis or a completely new primary cancer?

Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis was a primary glioblastoma, a rare and aggressive brain tumor. The patient received a combination of surgery and medications including ensartinib and lorlatinib. Despite these treatments, she developed progressive weakness in her left limbs. The lesion continued to grow, and she passed away ten months after the brain cancer diagnosis.

This case report highlights a vital lesson for oncologists. When a patient with a known malignancy develops a new intracranial lesion, the treatment response might not match the biology of the original tumor. Doctors should consider the possibility of a second primary cancer rather than assuming the new growth is a metastasis. Timely pathological confirmation and a multidisciplinary review can help reduce diagnostic delays and improve treatment selection for patients facing these complex situations.

What this means for you:
Unusual tumor growth in known cancer patients may signal a second primary cancer requiring careful review.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
In patients with a known diagnosis of lung cancer, a new intracranial space-occupying lesion is most frequently interpreted as a brain metastasis. However, distinguishing it from an independent double primary brain tumor is critical, as treatment strategies and prognoses differ substantially. We report a rare case of primary glioblastoma occurring approximately two years after surgery for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung adenocarcinoma. A 63-year-old female underwent radical resection for stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (ALK-positive) and received adjuvant ensartinib. Two years postoperatively, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a solitary lesion in the right centrum semiovale, which was clinically misdiagnosed as a brain metastasis. The patient was subsequently treated with lorlatinib combined with stereotactic radiotherapy. Despite these interventions, she developed progressive left-sided limb weakness, and imaging demonstrated continuous lesion progression. Subsequent surgical resection and pathological examination confirmed primary glioblastoma, strongly supporting a diagnosis of metachronous double primary cancers (DPCs). The patient died 10 months after the glioblastoma diagnosis. This case highlights that during long-term follow-up of patients with malignancies, a new intracranial lesions may warrant consideration of a second primary cancer (SPC), particularly when the treatment response is not consistent with the expected biology of the original tumor. Timely pathological confirmation and multidisciplinary review may help reduce diagnostic delay and improve treatment selection.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.