Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

dlPFC subregions show distinct activation patterns across acute pain, chronic pain, and placebo analgesiaBrain Mapping Identifies Specific Areas Involved in Pain Processing

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that dlPFC subregions 8, 9, and 46 show similar activation across acute, chronic, and placebo analgesia.

This meta-analysis synthesizes neuroimaging data from over 4000 participants to map dlPFC subregions involved in different pain processing conditions. The study specifically examines acute pain, chronic pain, placebo analgesia, conditioned pain modulation, and offset analgesia to identify distinct cortical signatures.

The analysis found remarkably similar activation patterns predominantly within Brodmann areas 8, 9, and 46 for acute pain (n=814), chronic pain (n=2467), and placebo analgesia (n=791). In contrast, specific modalities showed more localized engagement: offset analgesia appeared to preferentially engage Brodmann areas 8 and 45 (n=47), while conditioned pain modulation appeared to preferentially engage Brodmann areas 9 and 46 (n=184).

The findings suggest that different types of pain perception and modulation may involve overlapping but distinct cortical architectures. These results are intended to refine the selection of anatomical targets for non-invasive brain stimulation therapies in pain management. However, these results represent associations between neuroimaging data and pain paradigms rather than clinical trial outcomes.

Researchers analyzed neuroimaging data from over 4,000 people to map how the brain handles various types of pain. They looked at acute pain, chronic pain, and the effects of placebo treatments. The study found that these three conditions share very similar activation patterns in specific regions of the brain called Brodmann areas 8, 9, and 46.

The research also looked at how the brain processes relief. It found that certain types of relief, like offset analgesia and conditioned pain modulation, activate slightly different subregions. Specifically, offset analgesia showed a preference for areas 8 and 45, while conditioned pain modulation favored areas 9 and 46.

Because this was a meta-analysis of brain scans rather than a clinical trial, the results do not provide a new treatment or medicine. However, these findings are important because they help map out exactly where pain signals travel in the brain. This information can help doctors better target non-invasive brain stimulation to help patients manage their pain.

What this means for you:
Mapping shows specific brain regions involved in different types of pain and relief, which may help target future treatments.

Common questions

What did the study find about how the brain processes different types of pain?

The study found that acute pain, chronic pain, and placebo analgesia show very similar activation patterns in the brain. These patterns were mostly located in Brodmann areas 8, 9, and 46. The results did not show a clear difference based on which side of the brain was active.

How does the brain react to different types of pain relief?

The study found that different methods of relief use slightly different areas. Offset analgesia appeared to engage Brodmann areas 8 and 45, while conditioned pain modulation appeared to engage Brodmann areas 9 and 46.

How can these findings help people with chronic pain?

While this study was not a clinical trial for a new drug or treatment, it provides a detailed map of the brain. This information helps researchers identify specific targets for non-invasive brain stimulation to help manage various types of pain.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 4,000
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has become a cornerstone of pain neuroscience, believed critically involved in processing acute and chronic pain, as well as in pain modulation. The dlPFC is thought to balance sensory perception with the cognitive appraisal of noxious stimuli. In humans however, the dlPFC spans several cortical nodes, and little attention has been given to precisely which subareas are tethered to these delineable processes. The primary goal of this review and co-ordinate based meta-analysis was to precisely map dlPFC areas engaged under varied effects on overall pain perception. METHODS: Here, we combined a stringent meta-analytic approach of neuroimaging studies reporting dlPFC activation as a core finding (i.e., within title, abstract, or keywords of each manuscript), with activation likelihood estimation to determine dlPFC engagement across experimental acute pain (combined n = 814), chronic pain (combined n = 2467), and the pain modulatory phenomenon of placebo analgesia (combined n = 791), conditioned pain modulation (combined n = 184), and offset analgesia (combined n = 47). Through activation likelihood estimate and foci analysis, we produced schema of the similar and disparate locations of dlPFC activity within and between pain perceptual and modulatory effects. RESULTS: During both acute and chronic pain and in placebo analgesia, we identified remarkably similar activation patterns predominantly within Brodmann areas 8, 9, and 46-with no clear laterality effect and the left and right cortical hemispheres engaged regardless of the site of experimentally applied or conditionally-present pain. Offset analgesia and conditioned pain modulation appeared to preferentially engage Brodmann areas 8 and 45, and 9 and 46, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the dlPFC large cortical surface area, these findings suggest that both the percept and inhibition of pain by placebo engage a similar focussed area of this region. Better understanding of exactly which cortical components of the extensive cortical pain system are involved in pain perception and modulation is critical for refining novel treatments such as non-invasive brain stimulation which seek to target and modulate specific sites of cortical processing to alleviate pain. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This meta-analysis precisely maps the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) subregions engaged across acute pain, chronic pain and major endogenous pain-modulation paradigms. By integrating data from more than 4000 participants, it provides the most anatomically resolved evidence to date that dlPFC engagement is a shared feature of pain perception and modulation. These findings refine the cortical targets most relevant for therapeutic neuromodulation and strengthen the rationale for dlPFC-focused interventions in pain treatment.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.