Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid shows no significant difference from lactated Ringer's in post-ERCP pancreatitis incidenceTrial Shows Balanced Crystalloid Similar to Lactated Ringer's Solution

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid and lactated Ringer's show no significant difference in PEP incidence.

This randomized superiority trial enrolled 813 adults with native papillae and moderate-to-high PEP risk who lacked access to rectal NSAIDs. The study was conducted at three academic hospitals in Korea to compare acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid (AC) against lactated Ringer's solution (LR) as primary hydration fluids.

The primary outcome was PEP incidence. The study reported a 12.4% incidence in the LR group (404 patients) compared to 11.5% in the AC group (409 patients). The results showed no significant difference between the two fluids (RR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35; P = 0.70). Secondary outcomes for mild PEP (7.9% vs 7.1%) and moderate PEP (4.5% vs 4.4%) were also reported as similar between groups.

No significant safety differences were observed between the two agents, and no severe PEP or fluid overload occurred in either group. While the study provides a direct comparison of these crystalloids, the follow-up duration was not reported. Lactated Ringer's remains the recommended first-line crystalloid for aggressive hydration when rectal NSAIDs are unavailable.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in the direct comparison of crystalloid types for post-ERCP pancreatitis prevention. While prior coverage noted that predictive models for post-ERCP pancreatitis show moderate accuracy, this trial provides evidence on the specific efficacy of balanced crystalloids versus lactated Ringer's solution. The finding confirms that both fluids yield similar PEP incidence rates in high-risk patients.

Researchers conducted a large study involving 813 adults to compare two types of intravenous fluids. The goal was to see if acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid (AC) performed differently than lactated Ringer's solution (LR) in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). This is important for patients who cannot take certain pain medications before a procedure.

The results showed no significant difference between the two fluids. Patients receiving the balanced crystalloid had a 11.5% rate of PEP, while those receiving lactated Ringer's had a 12.4% rate. Both types of fluid were equally effective at preventing mild and moderate cases of the condition. No serious safety issues or fluid overloads were reported for either group.

Because both fluids performed similarly, lactated Ringer's remains a standard first-line choice for hydration when other options are not available. While the results show that both fluids are effective, patients should always discuss specific hydration plans with their doctors before undergoing medical procedures.

What this means for you:
Both acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid and lactated Ringer's show similar success in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Common questions

Is it safe to use balanced crystalloid for hydration?

The study found no significant safety differences between acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid and lactated Ringer's solution. No serious cases of pancreatitis or fluid overload occurred in either group during the trial. You should talk to your doctor about which fluid is best for your specific needs.

How effective are these fluids at preventing pancreatitis?

The study showed that both fluids were effective. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 11.5% for those receiving balanced crystalloid and 12.4% for those receiving lactated Ringer's. There was no significant difference in the rates of mild or moderate cases between the two groups.

What is the main difference between these two fluids?

The study compared acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid and lactated Ringer's solution. While they are different types of crystalloid fluids, the results showed they performed similarly in preventing complications. Lactated Ringer's remains a standard first-line choice for hydration when other options are unavailable.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 813
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Aggressive peri-procedural intravenous fluid (IVF) therapy with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) reduces the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), but the standard 8-h protocol is impractical in outpatient settings and the optimal fluid type remains uncertain. We compared LR with an acetate-buffered balanced crystalloid (AC) using a symptom-guided 4-h aggressive IVF protocol. METHODS: This multicentre, double-blind, randomized superiority trial was conducted at three academic hospitals in Korea where rectal NSAIDs are unavailable. Adults with native papillae and moderate-to-high PEP risk were randomized to receive LR or AC. The IVF protocol comprised 10 mL/kg boluses before and after ERCP, followed by 3 mL/kg/h for 4 hours and extended to 8 hours if abdominal pain developed or worsened. The primary outcome was PEP incidence; secondary outcomes included early post-ERCP pain and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 813 patients (404 LR, 409 AC), PEP occurred in 12.4% of the LR group and 11.5% of the AC group (relative risk [RR] 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35; P = 0.70). Rates of mild (7.9% vs. 7.1%) and moderate (4.5% vs. 4.4%) PEP were similar, and no severe PEP or fluid overload occurred. Among the 68.3% of patients who remained asymptomatic at 4 hours and required only 4-h IVF, PEP occurred in 7.4%, with no cases of severe PEP. CONCLUSION: In this superiority trial, acetate-buffered crystalloid did not reduce PEP compared with lactated Ringer's solution, and no significant safety differences were observed between the two agents. Lactated Ringer's remains the recommended first-line crystalloid for aggressive hydration when rectal NSAIDs are unavailable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05832047).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.