Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Environmental DNA and next-generation sequencing offer potential for post-elimination surveillance of neglected tropical diseasesNew DNA tracking methods could help stop tropical diseases

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider environmental DNA and next-generation sequencing as potential tools for monitoring NTDs in post-elimination settings.

This narrative review explores the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) as tools for post-elimination surveillance of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), including lymphatic filariasis, schistosomiasis, rabies, and soil-transmitted helminthiases. The authors synthesize findings regarding the utility of NGS-based wastewater surveillance for population-level pathogen detection and the identification of NTD signals in environmental matrices, vectors, intermediate hosts, and animal reservoirs.

While the review identifies that NTD signals can be recovered from various sources, it notes that environmental NGS remains underused for these specific diseases. A significant gap identified is the lack of an operational framework to deploy genomic surveillance in resource-limited settings following disease elimination. Furthermore, the authors note that while detection is possible, integrating these signals with clinical data and infection prevalence is necessary.

The review suggests that integrating environmental genomic surveillance into NTD programs may address limitations of traditional tools in post-elimination phases. However, the evidence does not provide specific efficacy rates or clinical trial data for NGS in any single location.

How this fits prior evidence

This narrative review addresses a gap in monitoring methods for lymphatic filariasis and schistosomiasis. While prior coverage noted that Schistosomiasis infection increases odds of malaria co-infection by 1.27 in children, this review explores new surveillance technologies like NGS to monitor these diseases post-elimination. It also complements existing information on the challenges of lymphatic filariasis elimination by suggesting genomic tools where traditional methods may be insufficient.

Tracking certain tropical diseases like rabies or soil-transmitted worms is hard once a community thinks they have cleared the infection. Traditional methods often fail to catch every lingering case, which can lead to new outbreaks later on.

Researchers are looking at using environmental DNA and next-generation sequencing. This technology looks for traces of pathogens in water, soil, and even animal hosts. It acts like a high-tech net that catches signals from parasites and worms that might still be hiding in the environment.

While this method shows promise for finding where diseases are lurking, it is not yet ready for everyday use in every clinic. There is currently no set plan for how to use these tools in areas with limited resources. Experts say we still need to connect these environmental signals to actual clinical data before it can become a standard tool.

What this means for you:
DNA tracking from water and soil could help find hidden parasites that traditional methods might miss.

Common questions

What diseases can this new method help track?

This technology can be used to monitor several neglected tropical diseases. This includes conditions like lymphatic filariasis, schistosomiasis, rabies, and soil-transmitted helminthiases (worms that live in the soil).

How does environmental DNA work for tracking disease?

The method looks for genetic material from pathogens in various places. This includes environmental matrices like water or soil, as well as vectors, intermediate hosts, and animal reservoirs where diseases might hide.

Is this technology ready to use in every clinic right now?

Not yet. While the technology can detect pathogens at a population level, there is currently no operational framework for using it in resource-limited settings. More work is needed to link these signals to actual clinical data.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Post-elimination surveillance remains one of the most difficult challenges in neglected tropical disease (NTD) control. As countries in the Western Pacific Region approach elimination targets, conventional diagnostic tools such as microscopy and antigen rapid tests, optimised for moderate-to-high prevalence settings, are insufficient to detect the rare, focal, or reintroduced transmission that characterises near-elimination settings. The WHO Global Report on Neglected Tropical Diseases 2025 identifies weak surveillance systems and insufficient diagnostic innovation as primary threats to sustaining gains toward the 2030 road map, yet no operational framework exists for deploying environmental genomic surveillance in resource-limited post-elimination settings. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the transformative potential of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based wastewater surveillance for population-level pathogen detection, yet environmental NGS remains substantially underused for NTDs. In the Philippines, where lymphatic filariasis and Schistosoma japonicum approach elimination while soil-transmitted helminthiases, foodborne trematodes and rabies persist at low, focal prevalence, climate-driven rainfall and flooding concentrate pathogen burden within specific watersheds, drainage systems and habitats. Effective surveillance therefore requires frameworks that go beyond assay sensitivity and specificity to address how surveillance objectives, low-prevalence conditions, sampling strategy, and resource constraints jointly determine what can realistically be detected. This narrative review synthesises evidence on targeted and metagenomic NGS across the three locations in which an NTD signal can be recovered: environmental matrices, vectors and intermediate hosts, and animal reservoirs, using lymphatic filariasis, schistosomiasis, rabies, and related NTDs in the Philippines as a case example. We organise diseases by transmission route and the resulting signal location, which together determine the sampling matrix and the appropriate NGS approach (metabarcoding versus shotgun metagenomics). We argue that the principal remaining gap is not detection but integration: calibrating the environmental signal to infection prevalence and linking it with vector, host and clinical data to guide programmatic decisions, aligned with the 2030 NTD road map.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.