Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Aerobic exercise shows limited cognitive benefit in brain injury rehabilitation pilot study

Aerobic exercise shows limited cognitive benefit in brain injury rehabilitation pilot study
Photo by Babak Eshaghian / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that this pilot study found no significant benefit of aerobic exercise on primary cognitive outcomes in brain injury rehabilitation.

This randomized controlled pilot study enrolled 12 participants (10 men, 2 women; aged 16-65 years) with moderate to severe stroke or traumatic brain injury at least 3 months post-injury in an outpatient rehabilitation program. The intervention was 30 minutes of aerobic exercise 3-4 times per week for 8 weeks, compared to routine physical therapy.

The primary outcomes were cognitive function, fatigue, and neuroplasticity. No significant difference between the groups was reported for cognitive variables, fatigue, or neuroplasticity. For secondary outcomes, working memory/executive demanding processing speed improved significantly in the aerobic exercise group (p = 0.042). Trends of improvements were noted in several other executive tests in the aerobic group. Automatic visual search speed improved in the control group (p = 0.027).

Safety and tolerability were not reported. The study is limited by its pilot nature and preliminary findings. The practice relevance is that experiences from this study might facilitate the design of future studies on this topic. The question of whether aerobic exercise promotes cognition and fatigue after brain injury remains unanswered.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up780.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To explore potential effects of aerobic exercise on cognitive function, fatigue, and neuroplasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: A randomized controlled pilot study. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS: Twelve participants, 10 men and 2 women aged 16-65 years diagnosed with acquired brain injury (moderate to severe stroke or traumatic brain injury), enrolled in an outpatient rehabilitation programme at least 3 months post-injury. METHODS: The intervention group (n = 6) participated in 30 min of aerobic exercise 3-4 times/week for 8 weeks during their outpatient rehabilitation. The control group (n = 6) received routine physical therapy. In addition, both groups received rehabilitation according to their rehabilitation plan. Neuropsychological and endurance testing was performed before and after the intervention and at a 3-month follow-up. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Preliminary findings show no significant difference between the groups regarding cognitive variables, fatigue, or neuroplasticity. However, working memory/executive demanding processing speed, measured with the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, improved significantly (p = 0.042) in the aerobic exercise group and there were trends of improvements on several other executive tests in the aerobic exercise group. Automatic visual search speed improved in the control group (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The question of whether aerobic exercise promotes cognition and fatigue after brain injury remains unanswered. This randomized controlled pilot study and its preliminary findings indicate greater improvements in executive processing speed in the aerobic exercise group, while more automatized attention speed improved more in the control group. The experiences from this study might facilitate the design of future studies on this intriguing topic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT07429526.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.