Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows death education improves end-of-life care competence in nurses

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows death education improves end-of-life care competence in…
Photo by Brett Jordan / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider death education programs for nurses; moderate certainty for competence improvement, very low for attitude change.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of death education programs on nurses and nursing students. The pooled analysis included a total sample size of N = 1,142 participants across included studies. The primary outcome assessed was end-of-life care competence, while secondary outcomes included attitudes toward death. Only 3 of the 13 included studies reported follow-up data.

The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in end-of-life care competence with a standardized mean difference of 1.05. The 95% CI for this effect was 0.76 to 1.34 with a p value less than 0.001 and I2 of 54%. In contrast, the effect on attitudes toward death was not significant with a standardized mean difference of 0.25 and a 95% CI ranging from -0.17 to 0.66. The p value for this secondary outcome was 0.24 with an I2 of 83%.

Authors noted several limitations including a high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity across studies. Long-term follow-up was lacking as only 3 of 13 included studies provided such data. The certainty of evidence was moderate for end-of-life care competence but very low for attitudes toward death. No adverse events or discontinuations were reported in the safety analysis.

Practice relevance is limited by these methodological concerns. The findings should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than definitive proof of efficacy. Clinicians should interpret these results with caution until higher quality evidence becomes available.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of death education on nurses’ and nursing students’ attitudes toward death and end-of-life care competence.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and CCTs.Data sourcesSeven databases (2014–2025) including PubMed, Embase, CNKI, etc.Review methodsTwo reviewers independently screened, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (RoB 2.0), and rated evidence certainty (GRADE). Random-effects meta-analyses, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses were performed.ResultsThirteen studies (N = 1,142) were included. Death education significantly improved end-of-life care competence (SMD = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.76–1.34, p < 0.001, I2 = 54%, moderate certainty). However, no significant effect was found on attitudes toward death (SMD = 0.25, 95% CI: −0.17 to 0.66, p = 0.24, I2 = 83%, very low certainty). Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits for online and in-person training. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. Most studies had high risk of bias, and only 3/13 included follow-up.ConclusionDeath education may enhance end-of-life care skills, but its impact on death attitudes is uncertain. Evidence is limited by high risk of bias, heterogeneity, and lack of long-term follow-up. Future rigorous RCTs with longer follow-up are required. Findings should be considered hypothesis-generating.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.