Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in SLE, with weak correlation to disease activity

Meta-analysis finds elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in SLE, with weak correlation to disease…
Photo by Bangkit Prayogi / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider NLR as a potential adjunct marker in SLE, but recognize its limited discriminatory accuracy and susceptibility to confounding.

This meta-analysis of 40 studies, with external validation from a single-center study of 290 patients, evaluated the diagnostic and discriminative value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The analysis compared NLR levels in SLE patients versus healthy controls and examined its association with lupus nephritis, active disease, and SLEDAI scores.

NLR was significantly higher in SLE patients compared to healthy controls, with a standardized mean difference of 0.850. Patients with lupus nephritis and active disease also exhibited elevated NLR. A positive correlation was found between NLR and SLEDAI scores, with a pooled correlation coefficient of 0.330, though this decreased to 0.200 after trim-and-fill adjustment for publication bias. External validation showed a correlation of 0.210. The discriminatory accuracy of NLR was generally limited, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.668 to 0.757.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. Key limitations include significant heterogeneity attributed to patient ethnicity and treatments. The authors conclude that NLR should not be used as an independent biomarker but may have a role as part of a combined assessment. The findings represent an association, not causation, and clinical utility is limited by the weak correlation and influence of confounding factors.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic and discriminative value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted using literature from inception to January 2026. Pooled estimates were calculated, and external validation was provided by a single-center study (n = 290). RESULTS: Forty studies were included. NLR was significantly higher in SLE patients than healthy controls (SMD = 0.850). Patients with lupus nephritis (LN) and active disease also exhibited elevated NLR. A positive correlation was found between NLR and SLEDAI scores (pooled r = 0.330); however, this decreased to 0.200 after trim-and-fill adjustment for publication bias, a finding consistent with external validation (r = 0.210). Its discriminatory accuracy was generally limited (AUC 0.668-0.757), with ethnicity and treatments being major sources of heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: NLR is elevated in SLE, LN, and active disease, showing a weak positive correlation with disease activity. However, its clinical utility is influenced by ethnicity and treatment, indicating that it should not be used as an independent biomarker but may have a role as part of a combined assessment.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.