This systematic review and meta-analysis examined randomized clinical trials of noninvasive electrical stimulation (NIES) for knee osteoarthritis in middle-aged and older adults, involving 1,137 participants. The analysis included multiple NIES modalities: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES and WB-EMS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), cranial electrical stimulation (CES), and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), compared against control conditions.
The main results indicated significant improvements in pain and function overall, though specific effect sizes, absolute numbers, and confidence intervals were not reported. tDCS showed consistent, moderate analgesic effects. NMES and WB-EMS improved quadriceps strength, mobility, and patient-reported outcomes. TENS efficacy was variable, with limited efficacy beyond short-term analgesia. CES and tVNS suggested potential benefits but were supported by only two small trials, precluding pooled analysis.
NIES was reported as safe, though adverse event data were not reported. Key limitations include high heterogeneity across studies and limited evidence for CES and tVNS. The authors conclude NIES appears to be a safe and promising adjunct in multimodal rehabilitation for knee osteoarthritis, but emphasize that further large-scale, high-quality trials are required to confirm its clinical effectiveness.
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in older adults, often leading to chronic pain, functional decline, and reduced quality of life. Conventional rehabilitation strategies frequently achieve only partial relief, which has stimulated interest in non-invasive electrical stimulation (NIES) as an adjunctive therapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to synthesize the available evidence on the effects of NIES on pain and function in middle-aged and older adults with knee osteoarthritis.MethodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, evaluated randomized and controlled trials investigating the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES and WB-EMS), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and innovative modalities such as cranial electrical stimulation (CES) and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS).ResultsA total of 15 randomized controlled trials, including 1,137 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled analysis demonstrated significant improvements in pain and function with NIES, though heterogeneity was high. Subgroup analyses showed that tDCS produced consistent, moderate analgesic effects, while NMES and WB-EMS improved quadriceps strength, mobility, and patient-reported outcomes, especially in individuals with muscle weakness. TENS yielded the most variable results, with limited efficacy beyond short-term analgesia. CES and tVNS were supported by only two small trials, suggesting potential benefits but precluding pooled analysis.ConclusionNIES appears to be a safe and promising adjunct in multimodal rehabilitation for KOA, though further large-scale, high-quality trials are required to confirm its clinical effectiveness.Systematic Review Registrationidentifier: CRD420251174723.