Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis finds CEUS comparable to MRI for synovitis detection

Systematic review and meta-analysis finds CEUS comparable to MRI for synovitis detection
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider CEUS as a potential tool for synovitis detection, but note limited evidence.

This publication is a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) compared to contrast-enhanced MRI for detecting synovitis, including in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The review synthesized evidence from multiple studies, though the total number of included studies and sample size were not reported, and the setting and follow-up duration were unspecified.

Key findings indicate that overall diagnostic accuracy was comparable between CEUS and contrast-enhanced MRI, with rates of 87% for CEUS and 87.7% for MRI. For knee evaluation, CEUS showed a higher detection rate of 93.8% versus 82.9% for MRI. However, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, MRI demonstrated a higher detection rate of 96.2% compared to 67.2% for ultrasound. Detection rates across different joints and underlying diseases were reported as 81.9% and 88.3% for contrast-enhanced MRI, though specific details on CEUS for this outcome were not provided. The authors noted a favorable safety profile for CEUS, but adverse event rates were not reported.

Limitations include a restricted number of included studies, which limits generalizability of the findings. The authors suggest CEUS may serve as a useful screening or follow-up tool for synovitis, but emphasize that validation in larger multicenter studies is needed. Practice relevance should be interpreted cautiously due to these gaps in evidence.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Synovial tissue proliferation in the bare area of the joint is an early indicator of synovitis. Vascularization of the pannus helps differentiate between inactive and inflammatory processes, directly impacting therapeutic management. Synovitis can be diagnosed through clinical assessment, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); however, uncertainty remains regarding the optimal imaging modality. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the accuracy of ultrasonography with microbubble contrast and contrast-enhanced MRI in diagnosing synovitis, irrespective of its etiology. In addition, the study aimed to determine the joints that were most accurately assessed for synovitis using microbubble ultrasound. METHODS: Electronic searches were conducted in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to February 8, 2025, with additional screening of reference lists. Studies assessing diagnostic accuracy or detection rates of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced MRI for synovitis were included without restrictions on language or publication status. Two studies were selected after quality assessment using QUADAS-2, and eight studies were assessed using the RTI item bank methodology. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracies of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (87%) and contrast-enhanced MRI (87.7%) were comparable. For knee evaluation, CEUS showed a higher detection rate (93.8%) than MRI (82.9%). Across different joints and underlying diseases, the detection rates were 81.9% and 88.3% for contrast-enhanced MRI. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, MRI demonstrated a higher detection rate (96.2%) compared with ultrasound (67.2%). These findings indicate a similar overall diagnostic performance, although the limited number of included studies restricted generalizability. CONCLUSION: CEUS demonstrated diagnostic accuracy comparable to contrast-enhanced MRI, except in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Given its low cost, portability, and favorable safety profile, CEUS may serve as a useful screening or follow-up tool for synovitis, pending validation in larger multicenter studies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.