Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Narrative review examines abscopal effect potential in non-small cell lung cancer multimodality therapies.

Narrative review examines abscopal effect potential in non-small cell lung cancer multimodality ther…
Photo by Ayanda Kunene / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider standardized criteria for potential abscopal responses in non-small cell lung cancer multimodality therapy.

This narrative review addresses the abscopal effect within the context of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors synthesize evidence regarding interventions including radiotherapy, lung ablation techniques such as cryoablation, microwave ablation, and pulsed electric field therapy, alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors and combined multimodality therapies. The primary focus is on the regression of distant, non-irradiated tumors.

The review notes that follow-up periods for observed effects range from 4–8 weeks. However, main results are not explicitly reported as quantitative data within this summary. The authors argue that unequivocal out-of-field tumor regression is not systematically recorded in most clinical trials. Consequently, recognition of abscopal effects remains inconsistent across current oncology literature.

Significant limitations are acknowledged by the authors. These include the limitations of conventional response assessment criteria and the difficulty in distinguishing true abscopal responses from natural history. The lack of standardized terminology complicates the accurate identification of these phenomena.

Regarding practice relevance, the authors emphasize that establishing standardized terminology and assessment criteria will be essential for accurately identifying and integrating potential abscopal responses in future NSCLC research and clinical practice. Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability are not reported in this review. Clinicians should interpret these findings as a call for methodological standardization rather than definitive efficacy data. The evidence base relies on observational reporting rather than randomized controlled trials.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The abscopal effect, first described in 1953, refers to the regression of distant, non-irradiated tumors following localized therapy. Historically considered rare, interest in this phenomenon has increased with the introduction of immunotherapy and local treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review summarizes the current evidence on the pathophysiology, clinical observations, and assessment of the abscopal effect in NSCLC following radiotherapy, lung ablation, and combined multimodality therapies. Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that radiotherapy and ablative techniques such as cryoablation, microwave ablation, and pulsed electric field therapy may induce immunogenic cell death, leading to the release of tumor antigens and danger-associated molecular patterns that can activate systemic antitumor immune responses. When combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, these local therapies may enhance immune activation, potentially improving both local and distant tumor control. However, recognition of abscopal effects remains inconsistent, largely due to limitations of conventional response assessment criteria. While iRECIST partly captures atypical response patterns, unequivocal out-of-field tumor regression is not systematically recorded in most clinical trials. The available evidence, primarily from preclinical models and early-phase studies, suggests that the true incidence of abscopal effects in NSCLC may be underrecognized. Accordingly, we propose a working definition of the abscopal effect in NSCLC: the regression (complete or partial response by iRECIST) of one or more non-irradiated lesions distant from the primary treatment site, occurring after localized therapy with or without systemic treatment, and confirmed by follow-up imaging within 4–8 weeks. Establishing standardized terminology and assessment criteria will be essential for accurately identifying and integrating potential abscopal responses in future NSCLC research and clinical practice.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.