Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review of acupuncture for sepsis-associated acute gastrointestinal injuryAcupuncture helped some sick patients feel better but did not save more lives in this review

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider adjunctive acupuncture may improve gastrointestinal function in sepsis but does not reduce mortality.

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of adjunctive acupuncture for sepsis-associated acute gastrointestinal injury in adult patients. The review synthesized data from 1,502 critically ill patients, comparing acupuncture (electroacupuncture or manual) plus standard care to standard care alone over a 28-day follow-up.

The authors found that acupuncture was associated with reduced intra-abdominal pressure, lower APACHE II scores, increased bowel sounds, and significantly reduced procalcitonin. However, there was no statistically significant difference in C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, or 28-day mortality. An exploratory Bayesian network meta-analysis did not detect convincing evidence of superiority between electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture.

The review noted methodological limitations and substantial heterogeneity among the included studies. Safety data indicated rare and mild adverse events, with serious adverse events not reported.

Practice relevance is that adjunctive acupuncture may improve gastrointestinal function and inflammatory profiles but does not confer a clear survival benefit. The authors caution that association vs causation was not explicitly distinguished.

A large study looked at how adding acupuncture to normal hospital care affects adults with severe stomach issues caused by sepsis. The researchers combined data from many different studies to see if this treatment helped patients recover faster or feel better.

The results showed that patients who received acupuncture had lower scores for illness severity and less pressure inside their bellies. Their gut noises returned more often, and levels of a protein that signals infection dropped significantly compared to those who only got standard medical treatment.

However, the study did not find a clear difference in how many people died within 28 days. Some measures of infection and inflammation did not change much between the two groups. The researchers noted that the studies had different methods, which makes it hard to compare them perfectly.

Overall, acupuncture seems to help with stomach function and some sickness markers, but it is not a guaranteed way to save lives on its own. More research is needed to understand exactly how this treatment works and who benefits most from it.

What this means for you:
Acupuncture helps gut function and lowers inflammation in sepsis patients but does not clearly reduce death risk.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAcute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) is common in sepsis and is associated with multiple organ dysfunction and poor outcomes. Conventional supportive strategies often fail to restore gastrointestinal motility or adequately modulate systemic inflammation, underscoring the need for safe adjunctive interventions in critically ill patients.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with an exploratory Bayesian network meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies enrolling adult patients with sepsis-associated gastrointestinal dysfunction were included. Acupuncture (electroacupuncture or manual acupuncture) as an adjunct to standard Western medical care was compared with standard care alone. No restrictions were applied to outcomes during the search phase. Risk of bias was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, version 2 (RoB 2) for randomized trials and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions, Version 2 (ROBINS-I V2) for the non-randomized study. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using fixed- or random-effects models, with heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analyses (leave-one-out) assessed. An exploratory Bayesian network meta-analysis was also performed to compare electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture.ResultsTwenty studies (19 randomized controlled trials and one retrospective cohort; n = 1,502) published between 2013 and 2025 were included. Adjunctive acupuncture was associated with improvements in gastrointestinal and physiological parameters, including reduced intra-abdominal pressure, lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, and increased bowel sounds. Procalcitonin was significantly reduced, while C-reactive protein and white blood cell count did not show statistically significant differences; heterogeneity was substantial for these inflammatory biomarkers. No statistically significant reduction in 28-day mortality was observed. The exploratory network meta-analysis did not detect convincing evidence of superiority between electroacupuncture and manual acupuncture. Reported adverse events were rare and mild.ConclusionCurrent evidence suggests that acupuncture, when used as an adjunct to standard care, may improve gastrointestinal function and inflammatory profiles in patients with sepsis-associated AGI, but does not confer a clear survival benefit. Given methodological limitations and substantial heterogeneity, well-designed multicenter trials with rigorous controls and clinically relevant endpoints are warranted.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024530297, Identifier CRD42024530297.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.