Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=194 Treatment

Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) for Bridge to Cardiac Transplantation

Heart Failure, Congestive · Ventricular Dysfunction · Cardiomyopathies

Enrolled (actual)
194
Serious AEs
100.0%
Results posted
Mar 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Survival — 112; 6; 18; 19 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Primary completion
Nov 2006

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Survival
112; 6; 18; 19; 3; 36
SECONDARY
Clinical Reliability (Malfunctions/Failures)
7; 2; 2; 10; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionaire (KCCQ)
29.5; 28.8
SECONDARY
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification
4.0; 2.2; 1.8; 1.7
SECONDARY
Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHF)
-32.3
SECONDARY
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
149.2; 235.4; 296.8
SECONDARY
Reoperations
8; 104; 7; 32; 8; 1
SECONDARY
Post-transplant Survival
96; 87

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the Thoratec HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS) as a bridge to cardiac transplantation in end-stage heart failure patients who are listed for cardiac transplant but are at imminent risk of dying. The HeartMate II LVAS was approved by the US FDA on April 21, 2008, as a bridge to cardiac transplantation (reference PMA P060040). It was approved for commercial distribution in Canada on May 20, 2009 (reference Medical Device Licence #79765). Patients enrolled into the clinical trial will continue to be followed until all have reached a clinical outcome.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

The following are general criteria; more specific conditions are included in the study protocol:

  • Listed for cardiac transplantation
  • NYHA Class IV heart failure symptoms
  • On inotropic support, if tolerated
  • Despite medical therapy, the patient must meet hemodynamic criteria for cardiogenic shock

Exclusion Criteria

The following are general criteria; more specific conditions are included in the study protocol:

  • Evidence of, or risk factors for end-organ dysfunction that would make LVAS implantation futile
  • Existence of factors that would adversely affect patient survival or function of the LVAS.
  • Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies.
  • Existence of any ongoing mechanical circulatory support other than intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.
  • Participation in any other clinical investigation that is likely to confound study results or affect study outcome.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00121472). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search