Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=434 Randomized Treatment

Comparative Infection Rates for the Codman BACTISEAL TM External Ventricular Drainage (EVD) System

Intraventricular Hemorrhage · Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Enrolled (actual)
434
Serious AEs
6.9%
Results posted
Nov 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Infections — 4; 5; 4; 5 Infections

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Bactiseal TM EVD (Device); Standard EVD Catheter (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Codman & Shurtleff
Primary completion
Dec 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Infections
4; 5; 4; 5; 1; 3
SECONDARY
Days to Proven Infection
9.5; 10; 9.5; 10; 14; 10
SECONDARY
Class of Bacterial Agent Causing Proven Infection
11; 0; 0; 6
SECONDARY
Intraluminal Colonization on Catheters
0; 3
SECONDARY
Device Related Adverse Events
0; 1; 1; 4; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Days With Indwelling Catheter
8.7; 8.9; 9.3; 9.7; 9.8; 10.4
SECONDARY
Average Subject Age
51.9; 54.4; 51.9; 54.5; 49.4; 54.2
SECONDARY
Diagnosis Requiring EVD Implantation
20; 17; 13; 335; 282; 197
SECONDARY
Non-infectious Catheter Failure in the MITT Population
16; 0; 0; 1; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Time Point of Introduction of Systemic Antibiotic Therapy
146; 149; 167; 175; 118; 124
SECONDARY
Hospital Locations for EVD Catheter Placement
45; 49; 159; 153; 37; 41
SECONDARY
Length of Catheter Tunneling Into the Brain
6.2; 5.8; 6.2; 5.8; 6.0; 5.7
SECONDARY
Number of Catheter Insertion Attempts
177; 178; 15; 16; 9; 11

Summary

The purpose of this non-significant risk study is to establish initial baseline infection rates for the Codman BACTISEAL External Ventricular Drainage (B-EVD) System (Antibiotic impregnated catheter) and to compare relative rates of ventriculostomy-related infection between Subjects with BACTISEAL or conventional EVD catheters in a prospective, randomized open label study

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The Subject is 18 years or older.
  • The Subject (family member/legal representative) has given written Informed Consent prior to enrollment into this trial OR, where the Subject is unable to consent and no relative/legal representative is available to offer consent, appropriate legal and ethical practices are employed and thoroughly documented according to the laws and policies of the respective country and institution.
  • The Subject (family member/legal representative) is willing to participate in this trial for the duration of the implanted EVD system and is willing to comply with the protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Within the preceding 30 days, the Subject has enrolled or participated in another trial utilizing an anti-microbial drug or medical device implanted in or directly influencing the CNS and/or spinal cord.
  • The Subject is pregnant or lactating.
  • The Subject has a suspected or documented allergy to the materials of the EVD system, including silicone, rifampin and clindamycin.
  • The Subject has a positive CSF culture prior to EVD implant.
  • The Subject is immunocompromised.
  • The Subject requires more than one ventricular catheter concurrently.
  • The Subject has had an EVD catheter within the previous 30 days.
  • The Subject has sepsis, ventriculitis, meningitis, a skin infection/inflammation at or near the implantation site, an ear infection on either side, or a severe respiratory tract infection that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would most likely compromise the effectiveness of the EVD system.
  • The Subject is known to have received systemic antibiotic therapy within a 14-day period preceding screening for inclusion in this trial.
  • The Subject has an uncontrolled coagulopathy or any other known bleeding diathesis.
  • The Subject is otherwise determined by the Investigator to be medically unsuitable for participation in this trial.
  • The Subject is a prisoner.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00197392). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search