Phase 4
N=331
Study Comparing Outcomes for Patients With Treatment Resistant Depression Who Receive VNS Therapy at Different Doses
Depression
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00305565 ↗Enrolled (actual)
331
Serious AEs
19.9%
Results posted
Feb 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). — -9.96; -10.29; -10.30 units on a scale — p=0.803
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- VNS Therapy (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Cyberonics, Inc.
- Primary completion
- Feb 2010
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-9.96; -10.29; -10.30 | 0.803 |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
16.5; 17.5; 21.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
6.2; 9.3; 11.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
27.0; 38.9; 27.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Sustained Responders at Study Week 50 (ITT Population). |
43.8; 88.2; 81.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
14.6; 15.6; 17.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
20.6; 21.6; 23.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
6.2; 9.3; 9.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
36.0; 44.4; 34.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
15.7; 16.7; 16.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
16.5; 25.8; 28.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
5.2; 11.3; 11.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
36.0; 47.8; 37.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Sustained Responders at Study Week 50 (ITT Population). |
68.8; 92.0; 76.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
22.5; 21.1; 22.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Clinical Global Impressions Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Percent Response at Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population) |
20.6; 28.1; 31.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Clinical Global Impressions Improvement Scale (CGI-I) Percent Response at Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
41.6; 53.3; 48.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
9.5; 15.6; 19.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
5.3; 9.4; 11.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Responders From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
28.4; 36.4; 26.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Percent Remitters From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
17.0; 17.0; 14.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-22.3; -24.9; -25.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-16.9; -17.0; -15.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (IDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-36.6; -36.5; -34.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-4.4; -5.0; -4.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-23.7; -26.5; -26.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-7.1; -7.2; -6.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered (QIDS-C) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-37.9; 38.5; 38.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-8.4; -9.1; -9.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-25.0; -26.7; 28.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-13.5; -14.3; -13.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-39.3; -42.0; -40.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-9.0; -11.1; -10.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 22 of the Acute Phase (ITT Population). |
-19.6; -22.6; -22.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-15.9; -16.7; -14.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) Mean Percent Change From Baseline to Week 50 of the Long-term Phase (ITT Population). |
-33.5; -35.5; -32.4 | — |
Summary
This is a postmarket medical device study. The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy administered at different amounts of electrical charge for the treatment of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient has a diagnosis of chronic or recurrent depression and is currently experiencing a major depressive episode.
- Patient has not had an adequate response to four or more adequate antidepressant treatments from at least two different antidepressant treatment categories.
- Patient has (in the investigator's judgment) sufficient impairment from his/her depression and/or depression treatment that the potential benefits/risks of VNS Therapy are warranted.
- Patient must currently be receiving at least one antidepressant treatment; the patient must be receiving all current antidepressant treatments in a stable regimen.
- If the patient has a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder, the patient must be receiving a mood stabilizer.
- Patient must be 18 years of age or older and of legal age of consent.
- Patient must be able to complete the evaluations specified in the study procedures flow chart.
- Patient must provide written informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patient has had a bilateral or left cervical vagotomy.
- Patient currently uses, or is expected to use during the study, short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy.
- A VNS Therapy System implant would pose an unacceptable surgical or medical risk for the patient.
- Patient is expected to require full body magnetic resonance imaging during the clinical study.
- Patient is acutely suicidal.
- Patient has a history of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or other psychotic disorder or a current major depressive episode that includes psychotic features (commonly referred to as psychotic depression).
- Patient has a history of rapid cycling bipolar disorder or a current diagnosis of bipolar disorder mixed phase.
- Patient has a history of borderline personality disorder.
- Patient has a history of drug or alcohol dependence within the 12 months prior to the baseline visit or currently takes a narcotic drug five or more days per week.
- Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational study.
- Patient has had a prior VNS Therapy System implant.
Note: Some IRBs may require additional conditions for enrollment.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00305565). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.