Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=4,203 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2)

Age-related Macular Degeneration · Cataract

Enrolled (actual)
4,203
Serious AEs
47.3%
Results posted
Dec 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Development of Advanced AMD in People at Moderate to High Risk for Progression. — 493; 468; 507; 472 Eyes — p=<0.013

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Lutein/zeaxanthin (Dietary_supplement); DHA/EPA (Dietary_supplement); Lutein/zeaxanthin and DHA/EPA (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 50+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
National Eye Institute (NEI)
Primary completion
Oct 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Development of Advanced AMD in People at Moderate to High Risk for Progression.
493; 468; 507; 472 <0.013 sig
SECONDARY
Progression to Moderate Vision Loss
515; 509; 519; 506 <0.05 sig
SECONDARY
Adverse Events
81; 87; 96; 104; 479; 484 <0.05 sig
SECONDARY
Progression to Cataract Surgery
708; 681 <0.05 sig

Summary

Oral supplementation with the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) formulation (antioxidant vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc) has been shown to reduce the risk of progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Observational data suggest that increased dietary intake of lutein + zeaxanthin (carotenoids), omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (docosahexaenoic acid [DHA] + eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA]), or both might further reduce this risk. AREDS2 was designed to test whether adding lutein + zeaxanthin, DHA + EPA, or lutein + zeaxanthin and DHA + EPA to the AREDS formulation might further reduce the risk of progression to advanced AMD. A secondary goal was to test the effects of eliminating beta carotene and reducing zinc dose in the AREDS formulation.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Men and women between the ages of 50 and 85 years
  • Macular status ranges from large drusen in both eyes or large drusen in one eye and advanced AMD (neovascular AMD or geographic atrophy) in the fellow eye

Exclusion Criteria

  • Ocular media not clear enough to allow good fundus photography
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00345176). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search