Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=110 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Phenylephrine in Spinal Anesthesia in Preeclamptic Patients

Preeclampsia · Hypotension

Enrolled (actual)
110
Serious AEs
20.5%
Results posted
Jun 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: The Umbilical Artery pH — 7.22; 7.20 pH — p=.38

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Ephedrine (Drug); Phenylephrine (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Northwestern University
Primary completion
Dec 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
The Umbilical Artery pH
7.22; 7.20 .38
SECONDARY
The Umbilical Artery Blood Base Excess
-2.8; -3.4 .10

Summary

Hypotension remains a common clinical problem after induction of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Maternal hypotension has been associated with considerable morbidity (maternal nausea and vomiting and fetal/neonatal acidemia). Traditionally, ephedrine has been the vasopressor of choice because of concerns about phenylephrine's potential adverse effect on uterine blood flow. This practice was based on animal studies which showed that ephedrine maintained cardiac output and uterine blood flow, while direct acting vasoconstrictors, e.g., phenylephrine, decreased uteroplacental perfusion. However, several recent studies have demonstrated that phenylephrine has similar efficacy to ephedrine for preventing and treating hypotension and may be associated with a lower incidence of fetal acidosis. All of these studies have been performed in healthy patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Preeclampsia complicates 5-6% of all pregnancies and is a significant contributor to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Many preeclamptic patients require cesarean delivery of the infant. These patients often have uteroplacental insufficiency. Given the potential for significant hypotension after spinal anesthesia and its effect on an already compromised fetus, prevention of (relative) hypotension in preeclamptic patients is important. Spinal anesthesia in preeclamptic patients has been shown to have no adverse neonatal outcomes as compared to epidural anesthesia when hypotension is treated adequately. Due to problems related to management of the difficult airway and coagulopathy, both of which are more common in preeclamptic women, spinal anesthesia may be the preferred regional anesthesia technique. Recent studies have demonstrated that preeclamptic patients may experience less hypotension after spinal anesthesia than their healthy counterparts. To our knowledge, phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension has not been studied in women with preeclampsia. The aim of our study is to compare intravenous infusion regimens of phenylephrine versus ephedrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension in preeclamptic patients undergoing cesarean delivery. The primary outcome variable is umbilical artery pH.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA PS II - III women
  • 18 years old and older
  • scheduled for cesarean delivery (no trial of labor)
  • eligible for spinal anesthesia
  • diagnosis of preeclampsia

Exclusion Criteria

  • patients with failed trial of labor
  • preexisting hypertension
  • body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2
  • resting heart rate twin gestation
  • known fetal anomalies
  • contraindications to spinal anesthesia
  • emergency procedure or refusal of consent
  • failure to achieve a T6 level of anesthesia
  • conversion to general anesthesia
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00458003). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search