Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=1,351 Randomized Treatment

Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock

Sepsis · Severe Sepsis · Septic Shock

Enrolled (actual)
1,351
Serious AEs
6.1%
Results posted
Jan 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Hospital Mortality — 92; 81; 86 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Early Goal Directed Therapy (EGDT) (Procedure); Protocolized Standard Care (PSC) (Procedure); Usual Care (UC) (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Primary completion
Jul 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Hospital Mortality
92; 81; 86
SECONDARY
Changes in Markers of Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, Cellular Hypoxia and Coagulation/Thrombosis.
SECONDARY
Resource Use and Costs of Alternative Resuscitation Strategies

Summary

The ProCESS study is large, 5-year, multicenter study of alternative resuscitation strategies for septic shock. The study hypothesizes that there are "golden hours" in the initial management of septic shock where prompt, rigorous, standardized care can improve clinical outcomes.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Suspected infection
  • Two or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria
  • Temperature /= 38˚C
  • Heart rate >/= 90 beats per minute
  • Mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory process or respiratory rate >/= 20 breaths per minute or PaC02 /= 12,000/mm³ OR 10% bands
  • Refractory hypotension (a systolic blood pressure /= 4 mmol/L)

Exclusion criteria

  • Known pregnancy
  • Primary diagnosis of acute cerebral vascular event, acute coronary syndrome, acute pulmonary edema, status asthmaticus, major cardiac arrhythmia, active gastrointestinal hemorrhage, seizure, drug overdose, burn or trauma
  • Requirement for immediate surgery
  • ANC < 500/mm³
  • CD4 < 50/mm³
  • Do-not-resuscitate status
  • Advanced directives restricting implementation of the protocol
  • Contraindication to central venous catheterization
  • Contradiction to blood transfusion (e.g., Jehovah's Witness)
  • Treating physician deems aggressive care unsuitable
  • Participation in another interventional study
  • Transferred from another in-hospital setting
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00510835). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search