Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=2,120

SAFEty of Two Strategies of ICD Management at Implantation

Ventricular Fibrillation · Ventricular Flutter · Sudden Cardiac Death

Enrolled (actual)
2,120
Serious AEs
18.2%
Results posted
Jun 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Severe Intra-operative Complications at ICD Implant and/or Events at Follow up — 18; 16 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Implantable defibrillator (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Primary completion
May 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Severe Intra-operative Complications at ICD Implant and/or Events at Follow up
18; 16
SECONDARY
Severe Intra-operative Complications
8; 4
SECONDARY
Sudden Cardiac Death at Follow up or Resusciation After Ineffective Documented Appropriate ICD Shocks at Follow up
10; 12

Summary

The aim of this prospective observational study is to evaluate the safety, over a follow-up of 2 years, of two strategies, consisting in performing or not performing defibrillation testing(DT) during first implant of implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • first implantation of ICD or CRT-D
  • Patients undergoing upgrade to ICD or CRT-D from pacemaker
  • Patients undergoing upgrade to CRT-D from CRT
  • Age 18 or above, or legal age to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who do not give consent to treat their data.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00661037). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search