Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=185 Randomized Supportive Care

Improving Cancer Pain Management Through Self-Care

Cancer · Pain

Enrolled (actual)
185
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Average Pain Intensity Score — 1.192; 1.304 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
PRO-SELF PLUS Pain Management Program (Behavioral)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
Primary completion
Dec 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Average Pain Intensity Score
1.192; 1.304
SECONDARY
Worst Pain Intensity Score
1.575; 1.522

Summary

This study will test two different doses of a psychoeducational intervention to improve cancer pain management. In addition, the study will determine if the changes in pain management behaviors that the patients and family caregivers learn continue to be used when the intervention stops. It is hypothesized that patients and family caregivers who receive the high dose intervention will have a greater decrease in pain intensity scores.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult oncology outpatients (> 18 years of age)
  • able to read, write, and understand English
  • agree to participate and give informed consent
  • have a KPS Score of > 50
  • have an average pain intensity score of > 3.0 on a 0 to 10 NRS
  • have radiographic evidence of bone metastasis
  • visceral or somatic pain
  • have a life expectancy of at least 6 months
  • are receiving outpatient treatment for cancer (not AIDS-related) with any single or combination therapy, and have a telephone line

Exclusion Criteria

  • A documented previous or current psychiatric disorder or if at the time of recruitment they are receiving hospice care in order not to interfere with the pain management program provided by hospice.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00708019). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search