Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=30

Comparison of Sleep Study Results After Partial Intracapsular Tonsillectomy Versus Total Tonsillectomy

Sleep-disordered Breathing · Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Median Change in Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI) — 3.8; 8.0 events per hour of sleep — p=.590

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
PITA or T&A (Procedure)
Age
Pediatric · 0+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
State University of New York - Downstate Medical Center
Primary completion
Oct 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Median Change in Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI)
3.8; 8.0 .590
SECONDARY
Number of Patients With Apnea-hypopnea Index (AHI) Less Than or Equal to 5
5; 4 1.00

Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate similar improvements in sleep-disordered breathing as determined by sleep study with microdebrider-assisted partial intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy versus total Bovie electrocautery tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The medical records of 149 children who underwent partial intracapsular tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy at the State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center or the Long Island College Hospital will be reviewed to identify children with positive preoperative polysomnography. 18 of those with positive preoperative studies will be randomly selected and offered participation in the study.
  • Once enrolled, the participants will be matched by age, sex, time since procedure and polysomnography results (Apnea Hypopnea Index Index within 5) to 18 children who underwent traditional tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (out of a total of 455 patients).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Recurrent tonsillitis
  • Craniofacial syndromes
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Sickle cell disease
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00887471). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search